I didn't say that. Leave it to the atheist to put words in people's mouths. The Godless are so extremely toxic. It's sad to see. I've rarely met a down-to-earth atheist who didn't pride themselves on having "figured it all out" and thus acted better and smarter than everybody else.
Read the Bible. That's what I mean. My point is that he doesn't follow the Biblical example and claiming God made him the way he is, is ignorant. He listened to the world, not to God. As such, he behaves as the world has taught him.
The convenient thing about my argument is that it's true whether or not the Bible is true (it is). The Bible could be 100% made-up (it isn't) and it's still 100% true that the guy you're complaining about didn't base his behavior on it and has instead based his behavior on the example given to him by the world.
This is a losing argument for you, and not realizing this fact would simply confirm my suspicion that many if not most of the people who claim to be logical and intelligent but who don't believe in God aren't aware of anything I'm not, nor are they any more capable of coming to rational conclusions than I.
He listened to man, not God. Your post is ignorant
This is what I had to go off off. Forgive my ignorance if I misunderstood what you were getting at.
As a side, why the does everyone think this is a competition? I don't care at all if I lose an argument based on what you think is true. I'm here for a few people, not this religious clusterfuck.
Again, you keep saying "God" like you know what you're saying, but didn't answer the question: Can you tell me what you mean by "God?"
There is no Satan. You've been fooled because you can't fathom that the evil you see is in you, so it must certainly be another. Some ancient mystical creature. After all, everyone believes it so it must be true, right?
This is the danger of assumption, which I'm certainly guilty of as well at times. I could have been more clear, I'll admit, but assuming things instead of probing for more information when things aren't clear always leads to misunderstanding.
Read the Bible. It simultaneously explains exactly what I mean by God and corrects all your incorrect interpretations and assumptions of what I believe.
The whole basis of Christianity is that mankind is sinful, wicked, corrupt, etc.
Every true Christian accepts this. None say "the devil made me do it". Satan can't make anyone do anything. If he could, that would mean God didn't really give us free will. This is why the first thing he did was question the Word of God. He needed to DECEIVE Adam and Eve into doing what he wanted, he couldn't make them. Satan did not introduce sin to the world, man did.
None of what you say in argument meshes with this, hence me calling you ignorant.
Also, the entire Great Awakening is deeply intertwined with religion and God. Q makes that clear, as does Trump.
And I know exactly what I'm saying. Also, "everyone believes it"? The fuck? The vast majority of people do not believe, and of the ones who do, many are deceived into believing false doctrines that aren't in the Bible. Anyone who believes (in the Lord Jesus Christ that is, you can worship Allah all day long) is derided and attacked verbally if not physically by society at large and made out as absolute morons who have no right to an opinion and certainly no right to make their ideas a reality in government. How in the literal fuck is that the "easy", "everybody believes it" path?
It's not a competition, but you're still ignoring the argument I made to instead argue about religion. My point is simply that you are wrong in blaming God for the way someone acts when they don't act in line with how God told them to. Unless I'm missing something, there is no way around this being true. If I'm missing something, go ahead and tell me. Otherwise, and again my point is, if you truly don't care about losing an argument (I don't either) then you'd acknowledge that you were wrong in blaming God. Instead, you did neither and just started questioning me on religion. I'm fine with that, but not as a subject change. I'm happy to debate religion if we first finish the original argument (and acknowledge this could involve me being the wrong one.).
He listened to man, not God. Your post is ignorant.
I know, I know, the word "God" is supposed to mean to me what it means to you and if it doesn't I'm ignorant. Proves my point.
God and Satan are the biggest psyops ever perpetrated on mankind.
Can you tell me what you mean by "God"?
I didn't say that. Leave it to the atheist to put words in people's mouths. The Godless are so extremely toxic. It's sad to see. I've rarely met a down-to-earth atheist who didn't pride themselves on having "figured it all out" and thus acted better and smarter than everybody else.
Read the Bible. That's what I mean. My point is that he doesn't follow the Biblical example and claiming God made him the way he is, is ignorant. He listened to the world, not to God. As such, he behaves as the world has taught him.
The convenient thing about my argument is that it's true whether or not the Bible is true (it is). The Bible could be 100% made-up (it isn't) and it's still 100% true that the guy you're complaining about didn't base his behavior on it and has instead based his behavior on the example given to him by the world.
This is a losing argument for you, and not realizing this fact would simply confirm my suspicion that many if not most of the people who claim to be logical and intelligent but who don't believe in God aren't aware of anything I'm not, nor are they any more capable of coming to rational conclusions than I.
Satan invented psyops btw :)
This is what I had to go off off. Forgive my ignorance if I misunderstood what you were getting at.
As a side, why the does everyone think this is a competition? I don't care at all if I lose an argument based on what you think is true. I'm here for a few people, not this religious clusterfuck.
Again, you keep saying "God" like you know what you're saying, but didn't answer the question: Can you tell me what you mean by "God?"
There is no Satan. You've been fooled because you can't fathom that the evil you see is in you, so it must certainly be another. Some ancient mystical creature. After all, everyone believes it so it must be true, right?
Wrong.
This is the danger of assumption, which I'm certainly guilty of as well at times. I could have been more clear, I'll admit, but assuming things instead of probing for more information when things aren't clear always leads to misunderstanding.
Read the Bible. It simultaneously explains exactly what I mean by God and corrects all your incorrect interpretations and assumptions of what I believe.
The whole basis of Christianity is that mankind is sinful, wicked, corrupt, etc.
Every true Christian accepts this. None say "the devil made me do it". Satan can't make anyone do anything. If he could, that would mean God didn't really give us free will. This is why the first thing he did was question the Word of God. He needed to DECEIVE Adam and Eve into doing what he wanted, he couldn't make them. Satan did not introduce sin to the world, man did.
None of what you say in argument meshes with this, hence me calling you ignorant.
Also, the entire Great Awakening is deeply intertwined with religion and God. Q makes that clear, as does Trump.
And I know exactly what I'm saying. Also, "everyone believes it"? The fuck? The vast majority of people do not believe, and of the ones who do, many are deceived into believing false doctrines that aren't in the Bible. Anyone who believes (in the Lord Jesus Christ that is, you can worship Allah all day long) is derided and attacked verbally if not physically by society at large and made out as absolute morons who have no right to an opinion and certainly no right to make their ideas a reality in government. How in the literal fuck is that the "easy", "everybody believes it" path?
It's not a competition, but you're still ignoring the argument I made to instead argue about religion. My point is simply that you are wrong in blaming God for the way someone acts when they don't act in line with how God told them to. Unless I'm missing something, there is no way around this being true. If I'm missing something, go ahead and tell me. Otherwise, and again my point is, if you truly don't care about losing an argument (I don't either) then you'd acknowledge that you were wrong in blaming God. Instead, you did neither and just started questioning me on religion. I'm fine with that, but not as a subject change. I'm happy to debate religion if we first finish the original argument (and acknowledge this could involve me being the wrong one.).