I am not a serious Constitutional scholar, just a regular citizen. I like the first few words of the Constitution...."We the people"....To me that means if enough citizens get together and decide to change the direction of our government, WE THE PEOPLE have that right and can affect the change we want. But it takes a lot of like minded citizens willing to go the distance to get the changes done. As far as delving into the Constitution and knowing what it says about your querry, I leave that to the professionals.
It is a good post to consider when considering what "We The People" means. When those three extraordinary words were spoken, it referred to a Christian nation being one nation under God. Obviously, that has changed since the passage of the 1964 Immigration and Naturalization Act, which allowed anyone form anywhere in the world to immigrate to America. Human nature is one to which it carries over the traditions and customs of their forefathers.
The colonists in American history carried over those ethos and traditions of their European forefathers. Morality and truth are socially constructed by one’s immediate nuclear family, local community and the church.
This is called the 'gemeinschaft', which, by definition, is a society based on homogeneity (sense of common identity) where common interests, an attachment to traditional and sentimental concerns resulted in common group morals and beliefs (ethos).
A cohesive community evolves with the premise of trust being earned throughout the community. The evolution of it forms the gemeinschaft.
Government forced diversity is contrary to this manifestation. It destroys it and soon attempts to destroy the family itself.
Diversity and multiculturalism is a 'gesellschaft' model based on heterogeneity and characterized chiefly by formal organization, impersonal relations, the absence of generally held or binding norms, and a detachment from traditional and sentimental concerns, and often tending to be rationalistic and secular in outlook.
No country in history ever survived becoming a gesellschaft.
Forced governmental multiculturalism is not new and was often used by conquering armies. Both the Assyrians and Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon used it for rewarding allied nations and to repopulate the vacated lands of Israel after they were carried off into captivity. The Soviet Union implemented a massive forced multicultural program on all the nations under its empire.
It did not work, nor has it ever worked. Instead, it always bulkanizes a country where cultural tension and pressure boils over. This is the gesellschaft.
You have heard the arguments: “What is wrong with Muslim immigrants coming into this country?”
“Why is there a big deal about this?”
Based on the evidence that the money interests control all nations, it 's readily apparent that the ruling elite support Muslim immigration. Is it because they know a dirty secret about Islam that most Americans don’t?
Let’s follow the trail to see whether the likelihood of this is true.
Americans have all heard about the “dumming down” of our education system, but did you ever think that the policy of "dumming down" would include genetics?
What does this have to do with Muslim immigrants?
A lot, really.
Bear with me as I explain it and later I will sum up what all of this means.
Islam sanctions marriage of first cousins, which has been shown scientifically to having disastrous consequences on congenital health. Historically, it has had a deleterious effect on the overall Muslim society in terms of extensive damage to intelligence, sanity, and health.
It's a hard nut to swallow, but 'We The People' means different things to different people. There is common ground though and its family and the right to live our lives without governmental persecution.
If one branch is compromised then the checks and balances inherent in the constitution can be used to override the corrupt branch.
If two (or all) the branches are compromised the final recourse is article five. Two thirds of the states could call for a convention and ratify constitutional amendments with agreement of three fourths of the states.
The next recourse is an attempt at peaceful secession and the abandonment of the US Constitution.
you do not need to be a scholar to understand this document in fact, the less scholars , the better.
I am not a serious Constitutional scholar, just a regular citizen. I like the first few words of the Constitution...."We the people"....To me that means if enough citizens get together and decide to change the direction of our government, WE THE PEOPLE have that right and can affect the change we want. But it takes a lot of like minded citizens willing to go the distance to get the changes done. As far as delving into the Constitution and knowing what it says about your querry, I leave that to the professionals.
It is a good post to consider when considering what "We The People" means. When those three extraordinary words were spoken, it referred to a Christian nation being one nation under God. Obviously, that has changed since the passage of the 1964 Immigration and Naturalization Act, which allowed anyone form anywhere in the world to immigrate to America. Human nature is one to which it carries over the traditions and customs of their forefathers.
The colonists in American history carried over those ethos and traditions of their European forefathers. Morality and truth are socially constructed by one’s immediate nuclear family, local community and the church.
This is called the 'gemeinschaft', which, by definition, is a society based on homogeneity (sense of common identity) where common interests, an attachment to traditional and sentimental concerns resulted in common group morals and beliefs (ethos).
A cohesive community evolves with the premise of trust being earned throughout the community. The evolution of it forms the gemeinschaft.
Government forced diversity is contrary to this manifestation. It destroys it and soon attempts to destroy the family itself.
Diversity and multiculturalism is a 'gesellschaft' model based on heterogeneity and characterized chiefly by formal organization, impersonal relations, the absence of generally held or binding norms, and a detachment from traditional and sentimental concerns, and often tending to be rationalistic and secular in outlook.
No country in history ever survived becoming a gesellschaft.
Forced governmental multiculturalism is not new and was often used by conquering armies. Both the Assyrians and Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon used it for rewarding allied nations and to repopulate the vacated lands of Israel after they were carried off into captivity. The Soviet Union implemented a massive forced multicultural program on all the nations under its empire.
It did not work, nor has it ever worked. Instead, it always bulkanizes a country where cultural tension and pressure boils over. This is the gesellschaft.
You have heard the arguments: “What is wrong with Muslim immigrants coming into this country?”
“Why is there a big deal about this?”
Based on the evidence that the money interests control all nations, it 's readily apparent that the ruling elite support Muslim immigration. Is it because they know a dirty secret about Islam that most Americans don’t?
Let’s follow the trail to see whether the likelihood of this is true.
Americans have all heard about the “dumming down” of our education system, but did you ever think that the policy of "dumming down" would include genetics?
What does this have to do with Muslim immigrants?
A lot, really.
Bear with me as I explain it and later I will sum up what all of this means.
Islam sanctions marriage of first cousins, which has been shown scientifically to having disastrous consequences on congenital health. Historically, it has had a deleterious effect on the overall Muslim society in terms of extensive damage to intelligence, sanity, and health.
How widespread is incest in the Muslim world?
According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into this little-known problem, about half of over one billion Muslims in the world today are inbred as a result of marrying first cousins (sic. consanguineous marriage). In Pakistan, nearly 70% of marriages are consanguine. Even in England, incest marriages exists with more than half the Pakistanis living there, and in Denmark the number of Pakistani cousin marriages are around 40%. Recently, it was reported the name Mohammad is the most popular name in the UK for newborns in 2022.
It's a hard nut to swallow, but 'We The People' means different things to different people. There is common ground though and its family and the right to live our lives without governmental persecution.
Amazing comment here🇺🇸. Thank you for posting.
It's a large part of the why for the 2nd Amendment.
If one branch is compromised then the checks and balances inherent in the constitution can be used to override the corrupt branch.
If two (or all) the branches are compromised the final recourse is article five. Two thirds of the states could call for a convention and ratify constitutional amendments with agreement of three fourths of the states.
The next recourse is an attempt at peaceful secession and the abandonment of the US Constitution.
That was discussed in the Declaration of Independence
And, if I remember properly, Q posted the Declaration of Independence more than once.