How USSS describes us. It doesn't look so bad.
(media.128ducks.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
A hallmark of hack coverage about Q is that every article (this USSS writeup included) must conflate Things Q Actually Said with Things Anons Talk About/Discuss/Ponder, Especially in Times When Q Is Silent.
That kind of reductio ad absurdum focus is in every smear piece, taking the most sensational, incredible allegations tossed around by AN anon, and blown up and held as a cohesive set of beliefs shared by millions.
That seems to be a common tactic; discuss the absurd as a way to discredit the fairly well documented. It seems to have been used on the Sandy Hook shooting (people like Alex Jones saying there was nobody killed), 9/11 (people saying there were no jets), and many others.