Can't garland block things if Durham starts framing a really clear case against bureau? Hes already said no actions against mccabe and comey, and it seems there only a tiny subset of the US pop that know and /or care.
I tried to find that out and was debating the other night with several posters and somehow I picked up a "fan" along the way that went back 3 or 4 days and downvoted every comment I had. No idea why this is so controversial.
My guess is Garland can only remove Durham for cause, but that could be easy since there are a lot of regulations he has to follow (same ones US Attorneys have to follow) and there are other regs for the special counsel. I also think if Garland tries to remove Durham there will be backlash from both sides. Real liberals (not the stupid socialists we have now) and lawyers will raise a stink because they will see that as interference or obstruction of justice.
Can't garland block things if Durham starts framing a really clear case against bureau? Hes already said no actions against mccabe and comey, and it seems there only a tiny subset of the US pop that know and /or care.
I tried to find that out and was debating the other night with several posters and somehow I picked up a "fan" along the way that went back 3 or 4 days and downvoted every comment I had. No idea why this is so controversial.
My guess is Garland can only remove Durham for cause, but that could be easy since there are a lot of regulations he has to follow (same ones US Attorneys have to follow) and there are other regs for the special counsel. I also think if Garland tries to remove Durham there will be backlash from both sides. Real liberals (not the stupid socialists we have now) and lawyers will raise a stink because they will see that as interference or obstruction of justice.