I'm not following you on this question. What I mean is even if Danchenko (for example) is a small player that can give Durham leads he needs to go after bigger fish that doesn't mean he shouldn't try for a conviction.
Sure - give Danchenko a plea bargain, maybe a 30 day deferred sentence and allow the conviction to drop off if he stays out of trouble for the 30 days. Durham will still get the info he needs, the person on trial will not have a record as long as they are good during that period, and it will stop the MSM and normies from saying Durham is doing wild goose chases and should be shut down.
I'm not saying Durham lied if that's what you mean. I personally don't like any of these cases where someone is charged for lying to the FBI. They are usually total BS because the FBI can say you got one irrelevant detail wrong when you talked to them and just put you in jail regardless of whether you actually lied or got confused/misremembered/misspoke,etc. What is it, like 90%+ of Federal cases result in convictions? They got Flynn on a lying to the FBI charge and tried to ruin him. Durham can't seem to do the same (without the ruin part)?
It’s like you’re new to the concept on this site that things are not always as they seem, and that losses can still be wins. You’re thinking too linearly still. This is chess. Have some faith that the plan is working even when things don’t look good on the surface. This trial was still a win no matter what the outcome would have been for Danchenko.
I'm not following you on this question. What I mean is even if Danchenko (for example) is a small player that can give Durham leads he needs to go after bigger fish that doesn't mean he shouldn't try for a conviction.
Sure - give Danchenko a plea bargain, maybe a 30 day deferred sentence and allow the conviction to drop off if he stays out of trouble for the 30 days. Durham will still get the info he needs, the person on trial will not have a record as long as they are good during that period, and it will stop the MSM and normies from saying Durham is doing wild goose chases and should be shut down.
I'm not saying Durham lied if that's what you mean. I personally don't like any of these cases where someone is charged for lying to the FBI. They are usually total BS because the FBI can say you got one irrelevant detail wrong when you talked to them and just put you in jail regardless of whether you actually lied or got confused/misremembered/misspoke,etc. What is it, like 90%+ of Federal cases result in convictions? They got Flynn on a lying to the FBI charge and tried to ruin him. Durham can't seem to do the same (without the ruin part)?
It’s like you’re new to the concept on this site that things are not always as they seem, and that losses can still be wins. You’re thinking too linearly still. This is chess. Have some faith that the plan is working even when things don’t look good on the surface. This trial was still a win no matter what the outcome would have been for Danchenko.