The entire 11th chapter of the Law of War is worth reading in its entirety. It covers a lot of important ground that we will be seeing disclosures about very soon.
Exactly, I came here to report that too. On p. 787 of the DOD Law Of War Manual is the beginning of Chapter 11.11.
11.11 CRIMINAL LAW IN OCCUPIED TERRITORY
This section addresses criminal law in occupied territory. Additional rules apply to
judicial proceedings against protected persons in occupied territory, which are also applied by analogy to judicial proceedings against internees in a belligerent’s home territory.188
It goes on to differentiate between civil laws and military laws, and much, much more.
The laws of war does not need both sides to agree. That is just a set of rules one side will use.
The law lays out what will happen if the other side breaks the rules.
Of course there has to be Laws of War.
Civilian law is the same.
Used to they didn’t. Korea, Vietnam and all since then have not been to win but to prolong. I know my history. The US has done nothing but hogtie our soldiers sent into harms way. When you fight a war, you are right, there are no rules except to win in my book. Just like a street fighter.
Yeah this isn't a dooming post but a lot of the laws of war is absolutely absurd like "let the foreign power occupy for one year" shit. ...imagine if a homeless guy takes over your house while you are out and now you have to let him live free and pay for everything for him whole he also sleeps with your wife. It's quite frankly retarded and no country in history with means to fight back has ever let it happen.
11.11 is also the sub-chapter in The Department of Defense Law of War Manual titled "Criminal Law in Occupied Territory"
The entire 11th chapter of the Law of War is worth reading in its entirety. It covers a lot of important ground that we will be seeing disclosures about very soon.
Yesterday's Q-Clock was pointing to this exact post.
Exactly, I came here to report that too. On p. 787 of the DOD Law Of War Manual is the beginning of Chapter 11.11.
11.11 CRIMINAL LAW IN OCCUPIED TERRITORY This section addresses criminal law in occupied territory. Additional rules apply to judicial proceedings against protected persons in occupied territory, which are also applied by analogy to judicial proceedings against internees in a belligerent’s home territory.188
It goes on to differentiate between civil laws and military laws, and much, much more.
The laws of war does not need both sides to agree. That is just a set of rules one side will use. The law lays out what will happen if the other side breaks the rules. Of course there has to be Laws of War. Civilian law is the same.
RULES for war? No wonder we can't win anymore!
Used to they didn’t. Korea, Vietnam and all since then have not been to win but to prolong. I know my history. The US has done nothing but hogtie our soldiers sent into harms way. When you fight a war, you are right, there are no rules except to win in my book. Just like a street fighter.
Yeah this isn't a dooming post but a lot of the laws of war is absolutely absurd like "let the foreign power occupy for one year" shit. ...imagine if a homeless guy takes over your house while you are out and now you have to let him live free and pay for everything for him whole he also sleeps with your wife. It's quite frankly retarded and no country in history with means to fight back has ever let it happen.