The purpose of Govt is to protect the rights and property of the people. It should do that and no more. The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
Two things.
First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.
Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.
Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."
That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."
The only thing that a government or leader should be for is enforcing an agreed upon document/constitution of the terms of individual sovereignty.
Sounds paradoxical, but then again Gods decree of free will sounds paradoxical too, but it isnt.
I don't necessary agree with "common descent." Also, the definition of "territory" is very important and not well understood in the legal sense. It is "territory" (AKA Jurisdiction AKA the area over which a Sovereign's Word (diction) is Law (Juris)) where all the fuckery happens. That doesn't mean territory has to be defined that way, but it is how it is defined. It is that definition that is fundamental to the fraud.
Nevertheless, without getting too strict with some of the words, I agree with your definition. Notice that no where in there is there a requirement for a Ruler as demanded through abuse of the legal conceptualization of Territory.
What is a "nation" and why would you want one?
The purpose of Govt is to protect the rights and property of the people. It should do that and no more. The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
Two things.
First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.
Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.
Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:
This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."
That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."
The only thing that a government or leader should be for is enforcing an agreed upon document/constitution of the terms of individual sovereignty. Sounds paradoxical, but then again Gods decree of free will sounds paradoxical too, but it isnt.
a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory??
Excellent reply.
I don't necessary agree with "common descent." Also, the definition of "territory" is very important and not well understood in the legal sense. It is "territory" (AKA Jurisdiction AKA the area over which a Sovereign's Word (diction) is Law (Juris)) where all the fuckery happens. That doesn't mean territory has to be defined that way, but it is how it is defined. It is that definition that is fundamental to the fraud.
Nevertheless, without getting too strict with some of the words, I agree with your definition. Notice that no where in there is there a requirement for a Ruler as demanded through abuse of the legal conceptualization of Territory.