2A: NEVER forget Cliven Bundy
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Yep, the government is literally a gang. Income and property taxes only exist to keep you working as an indentured servant, if you can't afford to pay, you will find out rather quickly that you don't actually have "universal human rights" like the right to adequate shelter, the right to own property, the right to freedom of movement.
You only get to retire because they find you useless compared to young fresh workers and physical jobs demand young fresh workers.
If income and property taxes didn't exist, you'd work enough to buy the food you want and some extra knickknacks.
You'd have a garden, you'd have livestock and life would be like a vacation where you work sometimes because you want to buy something specific.
Property taxes also legitimise land ownership. Land ownership is rediculous and only exists to promote government and gang jurisdiction.
If there was justice in this world, any man could walk o nto a piece of land that wasn't being actively used and build a house and farm and if the world was just he'd only use the land he needed and others would see his use and not mess it up.
It is psychopathic to "own" land, it's one thing to make use of it, it's another thing entirely to demarcate more of it than you are planning on using and then murdering any who wants to live close to you on a spot of land you are not actively using.
Yeah, if someone wants to build a house on your garden and livestock, shoot them, by all means, but if you want to shoot people because they are on a patch of land and "it belongs to you" is psycopathic.
I'm not sure I agree with this, just because I haven't finished thinking about it. Big topic. There are potential abuses if people do not "own" land. OTOH I believe the royals own most of the UK land and that is not right at all.
Well that's just it, any time you make a resource privately own-able, you eventually get to a situation where you have robber barrens who Lord over a caste of slaves who work for the privilege to have a space to live, which is a basic universal human right.
I'm not saying land ownership is unnatural, I'm not saying it's anti-capitalistic.
But if you believe in freedom and you want to construct a society that can never revert to feudalism and lordship, you must eliminate land ownership.
That doesn't mean have nothing.
That means that if you are going to use a piece of land for something, you go and make your intent known, if there are no disputes, you register your use and the law protects you to keep using the applied for land for the applied for purpose.
The purpose can't be "it's mine and I'll shoot any one who tries to do anything with it."
It's gotta be something like:
So the x acres of land gets registered to the house until it is demolished and you can sell the house, it's yours, you own the house.
Y acres of land gets registered to the farm, as long as it remains a farm and is actively used for farming purposes excluding rest years.
When the farmer retires, he imforms the registery that he retired, he keeps the house, but the unused land gets returned to registry for others to make use of.
That's my idea.
Everyone needs a place to live, no one will contest that, even in a limited space situation.
But we are in a limited space situation and there is no free land for free people to live on any where on this planet.
The only option is to live on "owned" property as an indentured servant.
Who are you applying to for permission? I think you are relying on trusting a centralised authority here. They would let you down in favour of a special interest or a government project for the greater good.
Communism isn't good for the little guy, even if it sounds like it is.
There is an option to buy land from someone else.
I'm not saying that there should be no minimum allotted land for a person. Maybe there should, that's the welfare state and maybe free people will agree to fund it because its nice to have a safety net in society.
Churches used to do this before the role was taken by government.
I would propose a decentralized registry on a blockchain. It's the most secure way to track information we have to date and land usage registry could be readily done on the blockchain with nfts and smart contract.
No easily corrupted humans need be involved.
The system could be fully and completely automated with open source, publicly audited code.
I'm confused as to why you would think a minimum land allotment is welfare/communism. You don't get taken care of in what I'm suggesting.
If you don't build your house, you freeze, if you don't farm you starve, if you don't have other skills to trade in return for food, you starve.
Furthermore, if you don't build the house, you forfeit your land usage registry.
There is no communism or welfare in that, it's actually pretty harsh it just doesn't require that you have money to "purchase" land from some organisation that has an army and will kill you.
I'm not suggesting welfare at all:
Merely the integration of the inalienable humans rights to adequate food, shelter and water.
That doesn't mean I think people need to give it to you. That means that the robber barrens need to get the fuck out of the way and let people live as the free citizens they are.
Land ownership creates land barren, land barrens create gangs (standing armies) and extort the people on "their" land. Land barrens rules for a few generations, then they call themselves kings and queens.
No one else has the ability to aquire real wealth because the barren just sets the rent high enough that no one can compete with him financially.
If someone moves out of the barrens jurisdiction, the barrens jurisdiction magically expands to recapture the dissident unless another robber barren psychopath narcissist thinks it's his jurisdiction, the it's war
Eventually the robber barrens control the majority of wealth and are spreading propaganda about how God has chosen them to lead all the other people because they are special.
Land ownership and territorial demarcation are 100% natural, that doesn't make it right, that doesn't make it moral.
We only think it's normal to own land because of 1000s of years of robber barrens, many native American tribes didn't even understand what they were signing because land ownership was a completely foreign concept to them.
They had territorial disputes, but that was over food and resources, they considered the actual physical land to be owner less and the concept of owning it to be insane because the land belong to the creator.
Let that sink in, the land belong to the creator.
What did the creator tell you?
That the land, animals, plants and rocks are all for your use as a human.
No one in history ever had the ability to buy land from God.
The land belongs to him. Even the promised land wasnt given to the Jews, it was just set aside for their exclusive use, God still very much claims ownership over that land.
Any one claiming they own land is claiming they own gods property, you wanna explain to the big guy why you murdered people who are using land he explicitly gave permission to all humans to use?