"...no outside coms..." I always took that to mean Q drops will never come from another source. We were both assuming, as far as I can tell, but there was an issue with a 'fake Q' of some sort when that dropped, as I recall. What Musk is doing there is a proof, (a work of anons), and not "coms".
Of course, some people wouldn't be able to cope with a Musk anon, because they can't get passed some past deed or other. That reminds me of many of the tactics I've seen used to cast shade on President Trump. If I don't buy it when it's done to Trump, I can't reasonably treat Musk that way, either. People change. The change is not always public-facing. Musk changed in some way and that change was evident when it split the leftist wife out of his family. There's evidence to be recognized in his situation.
How about current deeds? Saying Twitter will accelerate his creation of the X "everything app" (oh hello technocratic feudalism, China-style), or how Starlink plays perfectly into the technological control grid desired by our enemies? There are plenty of reasons to be skeptical besides some "past event"
Any set of tools can be abused. This is a freshman business discussion known as "business ethics" or "engineering ethics". Recognizing the risks of a design but pressenting those risks as the purpose of the design is fallacy: assigning motive. Any instrument can be used abusively, but we're not going back to the cave just because someone might get an owwie while we're on the journey.
Thanks for talking down to me by making sure to present business ethics as a "freshman" concept as though I am unfamiliar. If you don't think technology being created that lines up almost too perfectly with globalist goals while providing marginal, if any, benefit (especially looking at X) is not worthy of skepticism I don't really know how we can have a conversation.
Yes, I should keep my integrity and loyalty to Elon because you think he is a white hat.
I should keep my loyalty to Elon, a guy whos business interests are in China. A guy is continuing to expand his manufacturing in China, not America. A guy using Chinese companies to mine his rare earth minerals. His Neuralink chip is still rolling through, and is facing lawsuits from the seizures it caused to monkeys during testing. (Notice this information not being pushed by the media). Neuralink aligns with Klaus Schwabs agenda for micro chips.
X, the everything app is poised to combine Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter into a new super company. (But we're somehow sure that crypto and Neuralink wont be combined? From the same guy who made Paypal?) What was the original name of PayPal? X.com
X is indicative of a hand gesture of a Master Mason. X, the unknown variable. X the symbol on the Pharoah's sarcophagus and part of Skull and Bones fraternity symbol.
"B-b-but, he did the Twitter, and was holding a sink!"
What happened to that Mark of the Beast scare from 2021? Is it not the current thing?
You poor, poor, people.
Remember when everyone on this board used to scream "no outside comms"?
We could remind each other of that more often.
"...no outside coms..." I always took that to mean Q drops will never come from another source. We were both assuming, as far as I can tell, but there was an issue with a 'fake Q' of some sort when that dropped, as I recall. What Musk is doing there is a proof, (a work of anons), and not "coms".
Of course, some people wouldn't be able to cope with a Musk anon, because they can't get passed some past deed or other. That reminds me of many of the tactics I've seen used to cast shade on President Trump. If I don't buy it when it's done to Trump, I can't reasonably treat Musk that way, either. People change. The change is not always public-facing. Musk changed in some way and that change was evident when it split the leftist wife out of his family. There's evidence to be recognized in his situation.
How about current deeds? Saying Twitter will accelerate his creation of the X "everything app" (oh hello technocratic feudalism, China-style), or how Starlink plays perfectly into the technological control grid desired by our enemies? There are plenty of reasons to be skeptical besides some "past event"
Any set of tools can be abused. This is a freshman business discussion known as "business ethics" or "engineering ethics". Recognizing the risks of a design but pressenting those risks as the purpose of the design is fallacy: assigning motive. Any instrument can be used abusively, but we're not going back to the cave just because someone might get an owwie while we're on the journey.
Thanks for talking down to me by making sure to present business ethics as a "freshman" concept as though I am unfamiliar. If you don't think technology being created that lines up almost too perfectly with globalist goals while providing marginal, if any, benefit (especially looking at X) is not worthy of skepticism I don't really know how we can have a conversation.
Wow, cognitive dissonance much? 😆😆😆
It's called integrity, not "cognitive dissonance". You should try it out someday.
Yes, I should keep my integrity and loyalty to Elon because you think he is a white hat.
I should keep my loyalty to Elon, a guy whos business interests are in China. A guy is continuing to expand his manufacturing in China, not America. A guy using Chinese companies to mine his rare earth minerals. His Neuralink chip is still rolling through, and is facing lawsuits from the seizures it caused to monkeys during testing. (Notice this information not being pushed by the media). Neuralink aligns with Klaus Schwabs agenda for micro chips.
X, the everything app is poised to combine Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter into a new super company. (But we're somehow sure that crypto and Neuralink wont be combined? From the same guy who made Paypal?) What was the original name of PayPal? X.com
X is indicative of a hand gesture of a Master Mason. X, the unknown variable. X the symbol on the Pharoah's sarcophagus and part of Skull and Bones fraternity symbol.
"B-b-but, he did the Twitter, and was holding a sink!"
What happened to that Mark of the Beast scare from 2021? Is it not the current thing?
Are YOU supporting the current thing?
If you don't know the person or people behind Q how do you know what's an outside com?
Haha. If you don't know the person or people behind Q how do you know what's an inside com?
I'm not claiming it's inside. I'm saying we don't know.
Strange argument, sir. 🤨
So your saying the sink is Q?
20% public
So you dont think that anyome could read this site, read the q posts and set up comms for us to follow?