The second sentence in the title is my personal comment. It is what I have come to believe as I observed the breakdown of a number of cherished theories that have been taught as facts. The Big Bang, in particular, is in crisis because little about it is plausible in the light of data from better forms of observation, and they've run out of fantastical things to patch it.
The big bang has already been debunked with that new satellite, they found galaxies that would have predated the big bang, and others were lacking traits that would be required. That theory has been in trouble for a long time, relativity itself along with the redshift was the source of the universal expansion... but when the observations did not line up with the theory, instead of revisiting the hypotheses science reified the theory by adding dark matter and then later dark energy (as in matter and energy that can't be directly measured).
The root of this all is at least as old as the debates between the aether theories and materialist theories, the materialist view taking shape at the origins of what is now called science which was formed as a means to explain the universe without appeals to "God". This view carries into quantum physics, which is at scales that can't be directly SEEN, so they start with the double-slit experiment and see that the light is interfering with itself, but quantized light is called a "photon" and the only way it could interfere with itself is if it travels as a wave until it reaches the target... this is accepted as fact, but the ONLY interpretation that is rejected outright is the implications that the universe could not exist without an "observer" to "collapse the waveform potential universe into an actual physical universe".
Digging into just how much of modern science relies on reifications of observations and estimates that, while useful, are only approximations of reality or mathematical models for reality as opposed to reality itself, it becomes a real mind-fuck when it calls into question virtually all that is KNOWN (as in drilled in at a very young age), particularly when you come to learn that even the big names in science draw certain conclusions for philosophical reasons over any objective rationale.
The main problem with the Big Bang is that it means the universe had a beginning. Everything that has a beginning must have had a cause outside of itself.
And yet they still eliminate God by saying it was a random occurrence–-the sudden appearance of something from nothing. The irony is that miracles are not allowed in their materialistic view of the universe, and yet the Big Bang Theory relies upon one.
I believe it was Tesla discussed that when spiritual factors are considered in science that there would be more advancement in a decade than was seen in earlier centuries.
Thanks for posting this. Sheldrake's honest and open-minded approach to things fits right in with the Great Awakening. He's also occasionally really funny.
Sheldrake has done some extremely interesting experiments pertaining to the human mind.
In one, he demonstrated that a large percentage of the population is capable of 'knowing' when they are being watched - even indirectly such as through a CCTV camera.
Yes, that one is interesting. It's on a similar line to the placebo effect, which works EVEN WHEN you tell the person they are getting the placebo.
Another that I found crazy was the capacity for people to "will" a random number generator to tend toward one value over another... an effect that worked even if they printed the results before the start of the experiment.
I had a book titled "Chaos, Creativity, and Cosmic Consciousness" which was a trialogue between Rupert, Ralph Abrams and Terrence McKenna. It was doing just what we're talking about here, getting into REAL science that is not so much theoretical fringe as it is against the academic standard. Trading thoughts and theories on things that don't get asked in conventional scientific circles. For example; why do we feel someone staring at us...considering that there is possibly an energetic exchange that occurs (also questioning how they explain sight which doesn't add up). They talk about mushrooms of course and all sorts of terms (morphogenic) that I haven't fully wrapped my head around... great book, it's been 15 years since I've read it...might pick it back up.
Pick up Lerner's "the Big Bang Never Happened," while you're at it. That's a book that should be in everyone's library. The science is based upon his plasma experiments, and it's loaded with rich philosophical insight about how the narratives of science affect the mindset of humanity, which in turn affects our societal forms and institutions.
Does anyone remember the Dead Scientists List? I had a happily married professor with children who died of potassium cyanide poisoning. It turned out that he wasn't the only genetics professor who died of potassium cyanide poisoning.
That just proves that modern science is a big part of the evil matrix that dominates everything. These people aren't just mistaken. They are evil. The ones who are enforcing the narratives in every branch of science do not shy away from murder to keep it going. So, why is is so important to them?
I believe the official scientific narrative is essential to their plans. If you can get hold of Eric J. Lerner's book, "The Big Bang Never Happened," I would highly recommend reading it, but not just for the science he presents but for his philosophical insights. He presents some very good arguments for the idea that our view of the cosmos has an effect upon culture and institutions. I think the cabal people know this, too, and that's why they have presented the Big Bang as a fact. It is the vision of a universe of isolated bodies that have no connection other than gravity, in which explosions create order on every scale. It is a hopeless vision of death being the engine of life. It is a model that banished the need for God, whom they would evict from the planet.
The good news is that that their narrative is rapidly collapsing because everything they see now with better tools screams that their assumptions are wrong. It is getting to the point where clinging to the old story will make them look like absolute fools and liars.
That is not what they say. Do not cling to the theory out of a belief that it proves your faith. You will only be embarrassed in the end when they finally have to admit the entire notion was wrong. In the history of the world, an explosion has never resulted in the erection of a building, and God didn't create the universe that way.
A lie never proves the truth, and it is a mistake to compromise faith to make peace by melding it with the world's notions; but the truth of science, which they work hard to suppress, will show no incongruity with the idea that everything has been designed.
The fact that you are trying make the Big Bang into proof of God's creation of the universe only reveals a crisis of faith in your own heart. It means that you believe the lie on some level and are trying to eliminate the conflict that creates. Just chuck it and wait for the truth that will be revealed by scientists who are no longer constrained by an official narrative they have to promote in order to keep their jobs.
Please do not misunderstand my tone. I mean no disrespect. I am only telling you the truth as I see it. (The wounds of a friend are more valuable than the kisses of an enemy.) If you disagree, that is fine, but I hope you consider what I am saying. There is nothing in the natural universe that is a threat to our faith, but there are lies about it that are, and there is a reason the liars have worked so hard to maintain them.
I'm not saying that's how the universe was created, but that it was seen by the scientists as a flaw in their theory, which is why they're moving away from it.
Those people tried to suck me in a long time ago when I had hair. I didn't have enough money for them to be interested. Imagine that! I was rejected by a cult that is always looking for new members. I didn't believe what they were selling anyway. I don't think they have a handle on anything except making money from something they fool people into believing is scientific. I believe their science fiction-writing prophet came upon some interesting research he didn't really understand, and made it into a wealth-generating machine.
That's a bit vague. What properties of water were they researching (medicinal, as a power source, etc), and what religious organization lobbied to stop them?
Water as a store of information, intelligence, and liquid crystal transmission. Gerald Pollack’s The Fourth Phase of Water covers a lot of these discoveries. Definitely worth reading and watching his interviews scattered across the web. You can purchase his interviews with doctors at www.healthmeans.com for about $2 per interview. Lots of great info there.
I heard that water when piped after it takes 50 turns inside pipes needs to sit for several hours before drinking. Somehow waters memory and its benefits are lost when it co.es from the spigot. Don't understand it but likely a vibrational issue.
There is some very interesting research on that. Apparently water structures itself into an orderly configuration at boundaries and in the cells of our bodies. You can also create a gravity-defying water bridge between two beakers by applying an electrical charge to the water.
Environment for . . . what, exactly? LOL, did you say something not allowed for national security reasons?
It's not just water. Plasma, which is basically gas that carries a charge from free electrons and ions, self-orders, too, in just the same way, creating boundaries of double layers that isolate areas of differing electrical environments. It's a fascinating subject. Because of electrical and magnetic effects generated in plasmas, they do not behave like neutral (uncharged) gasses. You cannot predict a plasma's behavior with kinetic models or fluid dynamics, which is the error astronomers make trying to understand it. This is why they scratch their heads when they see structures in the cosmos that are impossible to explain from the gravity-is-the-only-force-that-creates-structure model they were all taught in school.
It is becoming increasing evident that we do not live in a universe doomed by entropy to burn down to an ember that flickers out in a cold and meaningless death. We live in a universe filled with mechanisms that constantly work to order matter and create form, and despite astronomical distances, we are not isolated from any of it.
The second sentence in the title is my personal comment. It is what I have come to believe as I observed the breakdown of a number of cherished theories that have been taught as facts. The Big Bang, in particular, is in crisis because little about it is plausible in the light of data from better forms of observation, and they've run out of fantastical things to patch it.
The big bang has already been debunked with that new satellite, they found galaxies that would have predated the big bang, and others were lacking traits that would be required. That theory has been in trouble for a long time, relativity itself along with the redshift was the source of the universal expansion... but when the observations did not line up with the theory, instead of revisiting the hypotheses science reified the theory by adding dark matter and then later dark energy (as in matter and energy that can't be directly measured).
The root of this all is at least as old as the debates between the aether theories and materialist theories, the materialist view taking shape at the origins of what is now called science which was formed as a means to explain the universe without appeals to "God". This view carries into quantum physics, which is at scales that can't be directly SEEN, so they start with the double-slit experiment and see that the light is interfering with itself, but quantized light is called a "photon" and the only way it could interfere with itself is if it travels as a wave until it reaches the target... this is accepted as fact, but the ONLY interpretation that is rejected outright is the implications that the universe could not exist without an "observer" to "collapse the waveform potential universe into an actual physical universe".
Digging into just how much of modern science relies on reifications of observations and estimates that, while useful, are only approximations of reality or mathematical models for reality as opposed to reality itself, it becomes a real mind-fuck when it calls into question virtually all that is KNOWN (as in drilled in at a very young age), particularly when you come to learn that even the big names in science draw certain conclusions for philosophical reasons over any objective rationale.
Well said. Good points all. I plan to get out my quantized popcorn to enjoy the collapse of all this stupidity in a comfortable chair.
The main problem with the Big Bang is that it means the universe had a beginning. Everything that has a beginning must have had a cause outside of itself.
And yet they still eliminate God by saying it was a random occurrence–-the sudden appearance of something from nothing. The irony is that miracles are not allowed in their materialistic view of the universe, and yet the Big Bang Theory relies upon one.
Cool the end of the dark ages approaches
I believe it was Tesla discussed that when spiritual factors are considered in science that there would be more advancement in a decade than was seen in earlier centuries.
Bible speaks of how God teaches man to understand all this.
Thanks for posting this. Sheldrake's honest and open-minded approach to things fits right in with the Great Awakening. He's also occasionally really funny.
Sheldrake has done some extremely interesting experiments pertaining to the human mind.
In one, he demonstrated that a large percentage of the population is capable of 'knowing' when they are being watched - even indirectly such as through a CCTV camera.
Yes, that one is interesting. It's on a similar line to the placebo effect, which works EVEN WHEN you tell the person they are getting the placebo.
Another that I found crazy was the capacity for people to "will" a random number generator to tend toward one value over another... an effect that worked even if they printed the results before the start of the experiment.
Yep, Sheldrake has highlighted some fascinating aspects to our reality. And he uses true science to do it.
The data speaks for itself.
I've never had that feeling. Perhaps other suffer from paranoia.
Or perhaps you are not among the percentile who possess this ability?
If you possess logic, you might research his experiments before dismissing them.
How about those times where you think about someone you hadn't talked to in some time and they end up calling you that day?
It has never happened to me.
Damn... Well, I can guarantee it's not an issue of paranoia, it sounds strange if you've never encountered it.
Perhaps it's Asperger's. As Rush said, I live in Realsville all day long.
I had a book titled "Chaos, Creativity, and Cosmic Consciousness" which was a trialogue between Rupert, Ralph Abrams and Terrence McKenna. It was doing just what we're talking about here, getting into REAL science that is not so much theoretical fringe as it is against the academic standard. Trading thoughts and theories on things that don't get asked in conventional scientific circles. For example; why do we feel someone staring at us...considering that there is possibly an energetic exchange that occurs (also questioning how they explain sight which doesn't add up). They talk about mushrooms of course and all sorts of terms (morphogenic) that I haven't fully wrapped my head around... great book, it's been 15 years since I've read it...might pick it back up.
Pick up Lerner's "the Big Bang Never Happened," while you're at it. That's a book that should be in everyone's library. The science is based upon his plasma experiments, and it's loaded with rich philosophical insight about how the narratives of science affect the mindset of humanity, which in turn affects our societal forms and institutions.
There is another book that also states the Big Bang is bunk….
😉
Will do fren!.. I've never been a 'reader' but I've always enjoyed sponging up information. I'd read Non-fiction over fiction any day.
You would probably avoid my own books, then. No matter. They will find their audience.
I've never felt like someone was staring at me. Perhaps feeling that way is a result of paranoia.
Does anyone remember the Dead Scientists List? I had a happily married professor with children who died of potassium cyanide poisoning. It turned out that he wasn't the only genetics professor who died of potassium cyanide poisoning.
That just proves that modern science is a big part of the evil matrix that dominates everything. These people aren't just mistaken. They are evil. The ones who are enforcing the narratives in every branch of science do not shy away from murder to keep it going. So, why is is so important to them?
I believe the official scientific narrative is essential to their plans. If you can get hold of Eric J. Lerner's book, "The Big Bang Never Happened," I would highly recommend reading it, but not just for the science he presents but for his philosophical insights. He presents some very good arguments for the idea that our view of the cosmos has an effect upon culture and institutions. I think the cabal people know this, too, and that's why they have presented the Big Bang as a fact. It is the vision of a universe of isolated bodies that have no connection other than gravity, in which explosions create order on every scale. It is a hopeless vision of death being the engine of life. It is a model that banished the need for God, whom they would evict from the planet.
The good news is that that their narrative is rapidly collapsing because everything they see now with better tools screams that their assumptions are wrong. It is getting to the point where clinging to the old story will make them look like absolute fools and liars.
Actually, the Big Bang was a proof of God, as anything that begins needs a cause from outside itself. Only God could be outside the universe.
That is not what they say. Do not cling to the theory out of a belief that it proves your faith. You will only be embarrassed in the end when they finally have to admit the entire notion was wrong. In the history of the world, an explosion has never resulted in the erection of a building, and God didn't create the universe that way.
A lie never proves the truth, and it is a mistake to compromise faith to make peace by melding it with the world's notions; but the truth of science, which they work hard to suppress, will show no incongruity with the idea that everything has been designed.
The fact that you are trying make the Big Bang into proof of God's creation of the universe only reveals a crisis of faith in your own heart. It means that you believe the lie on some level and are trying to eliminate the conflict that creates. Just chuck it and wait for the truth that will be revealed by scientists who are no longer constrained by an official narrative they have to promote in order to keep their jobs.
Please do not misunderstand my tone. I mean no disrespect. I am only telling you the truth as I see it. (The wounds of a friend are more valuable than the kisses of an enemy.) If you disagree, that is fine, but I hope you consider what I am saying. There is nothing in the natural universe that is a threat to our faith, but there are lies about it that are, and there is a reason the liars have worked so hard to maintain them.
I'm not saying that's how the universe was created, but that it was seen by the scientists as a flaw in their theory, which is why they're moving away from it.
I get it. Apologies.
Does this mean that scienctolgy is a real thing?
Those people tried to suck me in a long time ago when I had hair. I didn't have enough money for them to be interested. Imagine that! I was rejected by a cult that is always looking for new members. I didn't believe what they were selling anyway. I don't think they have a handle on anything except making money from something they fool people into believing is scientific. I believe their science fiction-writing prophet came upon some interesting research he didn't really understand, and made it into a wealth-generating machine.
That's a bit vague. What properties of water were they researching (medicinal, as a power source, etc), and what religious organization lobbied to stop them?
Water as a store of information, intelligence, and liquid crystal transmission. Gerald Pollack’s The Fourth Phase of Water covers a lot of these discoveries. Definitely worth reading and watching his interviews scattered across the web. You can purchase his interviews with doctors at www.healthmeans.com for about $2 per interview. Lots of great info there.
I heard that water when piped after it takes 50 turns inside pipes needs to sit for several hours before drinking. Somehow waters memory and its benefits are lost when it co.es from the spigot. Don't understand it but likely a vibrational issue.
Viktor Schauberger was one, he was very well known in interwar Germany but after WW2 the USA shafted him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXPrLGUGZsw&t=44s
And there was Rene Quinton who found out the miraculous properties of seawater.
https://www.panakosaguademar.com/post/rene-quinton-and-the-seawater-chronology-of-their-relationship
There is some very interesting research on that. Apparently water structures itself into an orderly configuration at boundaries and in the cells of our bodies. You can also create a gravity-defying water bridge between two beakers by applying an electrical charge to the water.
Environment for . . . what, exactly? LOL, did you say something not allowed for national security reasons?
It's not just water. Plasma, which is basically gas that carries a charge from free electrons and ions, self-orders, too, in just the same way, creating boundaries of double layers that isolate areas of differing electrical environments. It's a fascinating subject. Because of electrical and magnetic effects generated in plasmas, they do not behave like neutral (uncharged) gasses. You cannot predict a plasma's behavior with kinetic models or fluid dynamics, which is the error astronomers make trying to understand it. This is why they scratch their heads when they see structures in the cosmos that are impossible to explain from the gravity-is-the-only-force-that-creates-structure model they were all taught in school.
It is becoming increasing evident that we do not live in a universe doomed by entropy to burn down to an ember that flickers out in a cold and meaningless death. We live in a universe filled with mechanisms that constantly work to order matter and create form, and despite astronomical distances, we are not isolated from any of it.
I knew about that, the electrical aspect of water revealed by those experiments, I mean. Interesting.