All major events, disasters, problems, etc. that have happened in the United States make more sense when looked at through the bankers' own lens of debt refinancing. This is Part 1 that covers 1791-1861 (first 70 years):
1791: The United States becomes a country under the Constitution for the united states of America (Trust #1) PHASE1 Collateralize the Money
The First Bank of US (1791-1811)
$6M in debt owed to Bank of France in 1783 (Treaty of Paris, 9-2-1783 https://infogalactic.com/info/Treaty_of_Paris_(1783)) is added to plus interest and grows to $18M by 1788. Constitution created and all 13 states agree to be responsible for debt. U.S. officially becomes a country in 1791 with a 20 year "National Bank" charter (required by International Bankers); Debt due date is shifted 70 years to 1861 after it is re-collateralized. A big part of the re-collateralization required the setup within the Constitution of the Washington DC area (this becomes important in 1871). Sometime between 1783 and 1791, the King of England bought the debt from the Bank of France.First Bank of US setup by Bank Bill of 1791 (https://infogalactic.com/info/Bank_Bill_of_1791)
The War of 1812 (1811-1816)
The Bank charter expires in 1811, and was not renewed. So the British Crown, owner of the U.S. debt and "owed" interest, starts the War of 1812 to extract "payment", destroy records of their infiltration of the American Republic, and install players like Henry Clay to assist them in getting the 2nd Bank charter in 1816 (https://infogalactic.com/info/Second_Bank_of_the_United_States) along with the Tariff of 1816 (https://infogalactic.com/info/Tariff_of_1816), which along with the Tariff of 1824 (https://infogalactic.com/info/Tariff_of_1824) were actually the REAL beginning of the Civil War setup.
The Second Bank of US (1816-1836)
The Second Bank charter was also 20 years 1816-1836. Andrew Jackson (https://infogalactic.com/info/Andrew_Jackson) fought against the Bank and all the corruption it created and eventually arranged so that its charter also expired and was NOT renewed. Andrew Jackson was heavily attacked, including a rigged election by the cabal/British Crown in 1824 with 4 candidates to insure he did not win enough electoral votes (https://infogalactic.com/info/Bank_Bill_of_1791). It is also strongly suspected that the cabal poisoned, murdered, or arranged for a sickness of Jackson's wife who died in 1828 as apparent payback for Andrew Jackson not backing out of his Presidential run in 1828, which he won handily (https://infogalactic.com/info/1828_United_States_presidential_election). He served two terms 1829-1837 to make sure that the Bank Charter expired which was his primary mission and major accomplishment. The banking cabal pulled every trick in the book to prevent him from winning re-election in 1832.
Financial Crises and Setup for Civil War (1836-1861)
As payback for the expiration of the Second Bank Charter, the international banking cabal engaged in targeted activities to sow strife between the North and South, AND to create financial crises and disasters on a regular basis (ALL explained by the LACK of a Central Bank), all with the intention of further setup of the Civil War as the date of debt re-collateralizaton neared in 1861. International bankers viewed an American Civil War as a "necessity" to split the country into two smaller, more managable countries. And since they controlled the International Banking rules and effectively decided who could become a country, this is what they did*. This was the same play they ran on the Roman Empire to split it in two on a smaller scale at an earlier stage.
Source: KL presentation "THEY STOLE THE KEYS TO OUR LIBERTY & WE'RE TAKING THEM BACK" https://rumble.com/v1h04b7-they-stole-the-keys-to-our-liberty-and-were-taking-them-back.html
*Note that becoming a "country" apparently requires adherence to International Banking Treaties and Laws, which of course are all written by International Bankers. If the International Bankers do not approve it or you do not follow their rules, they effectively can block a new "country" from being formed.
Part II/PHASE2: Collateralize the Federal Property (1861-1931)
Part III/PHASE3: Collateralize the State Property (1931-2001)
Part IV/PHASE4: Collateralize the People (2001-2021)
Part V/PHASE5: Implode it All (2022-2029)
Original short summary post: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCbSJWq/a-brief-history-of-united-states/
The "two foundings" myth is simply not supported by historical reality. The country, the nation, the UNION known as the United States of America was founded by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Arguably, the Union itself was formed by the Articles of Association in 1774, albeit still maintaining political allegiance to the British Crown, in spite of their protests against the abuses of Parliament. But after the King colluded with Parliament and the entire Crown had violated British Law by making war against the American Colonies, the Union became one independent of the British Empire, again in 1776. One Founding, the articles of incorporation, so to speak. As for the country's bylaws, it was initially a confederation, titled the United States of America, a process of formation that began immediately following the Declaration of Independence, with the creation of the Articles of Confederation (approved by Continental Congress in 1777, ratified by the states in 1781.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp
There would indeed by an alteration in the form of government utilized by the country, a shift from a confederation to a federation, the result of the Constitutional Convention (1787) and subsequent ratification of the Constitution (1788) and implementation (1789).
No, the adoption of the Constitution was not a "second founding" and no, the creation of the 1st Bank of the United States was not a "third founding." One Founding, 1776. Alterations in form of government, in the country's bylaws, yes, but the USA came into being in 1776 and never ceased to exist, still existing today, albeit under hostile occupation.
Yes, the complex history of the banking/government connection is of much importance to reveal which forces, who really has controlled the USA, but be careful not to let these speculations and theoretical narratives undermined undeniable historical, legal facts.
Can you post this as “One Founding” or similar. It is quite good.
No doubt there was one founding, and I skipped that part because I thought it was a given. What is covered here is the immediate “tinkering” and “interference” that started in 1783 and became worse and worse, ultimately resulting in The Patriot Act and DNA modified voluntary servitude sheeple “property” of corporations.
Agreed, interference goes way, way back. Washington warned us, but....
https://youtu.be/vE8XJEeOpyA
The more cabal history I read, the more I think the Louisiana Purchase and probably the Alaska Purchase, were gifted by leaders who were about to lose control to the cabal, thinking the USA would be a better steward of the future.
Your comment is quite good and relevant because a big part of the Federal Lands collateralization that happened 1861-1931 [Part 2] is related to Alaska and other Federally-controlled territories.
All Federal lands are controlled by the House/Senate per the Constitution (Article I). The creation of Executive agencies (Article II) like the Department of the Interior is an unconstitutional delegation of Article I powers to an Article II entity which violates the Separation of Powers Doctrine. Ref. recent W. Virginia v EPA case.
Yes, including the District of Columbia
I agree this is likely. Russia selling Alaska to US clearly was a hedge against the cabal. The timing of the Louisiana purchase also appears to be consistent with your hypothesis. I don't know the details of the internal Russian goings on when that happened.
It is interesting you point this out, and if you want to pop your head start digging into the stuff about Greenland being purchased from Denmark. There may have actually been a deal, possibly for the same reasons: to remove Greenland control from the EU cabal-controlled goons. I think Trump was trolling the media about something they cannot talk about for some reason.
Well, the LP was from Napoleon, who was actively and continually engaged against the British Crown and its allies. Functionally it helped the US and also kept the area out of cabal hands. But it's hard to second-guess Napoleon's thoughts today, and the conventional explanations still hold water either way.
I think Trump was trolling about Greenland and the US Gitmo-esque properties there, but I'm open to being surprised. : )
Ridley Scott new movie likely tells the real story. Many of his movies appear to have soft disclosure of tech and real history.
One of the main points with Russia was they had trapped all the fur,so they had no interest In it anymore. They had million of acres of undeveloped forest land,they didn't need any more. They never found the gold,because the natives didn't value it......
I'm pretty sure they knew about the gold based on what they were doing in Siberia, but practically it was probably impossible for them to really manage or exploit Alaska properly while they were fighting off the constant Europe-based attacks of the cabal.
I look at it this way. The lineage of the Republic/individual rights out of the Roman Empire had a three-way split: 1. To Serbia and then Russia, and 2. To Dutch areas (from Friesians) that became the Dutch Republic and then France then America, and 3. To England (seeded America) and the Nordics (secretly allied with America); Cabal has attacked or taken over all 3 of these lines except some of the Nordics and the American Republic, and Serbia and Russia have been restored.
TDLR: So Russia was knowingly seeding one of the other lineages so that America would be strong enough to help them in the future, and this actually occurred when America helped destroy the Soviet Union and freed Russia again.
Jefferson's Louisiana Purchase was technically unconstitutional. Who helped rig the election of 1800 to cheat Adams out of a second term, install Jefferson, and push the US into further antagonizing the British into an eventual war? Think about it...
Is there a non-GA link to this post? Like all parts links on one page?
Not yet. Still working on the other parts. The KL video linked there is the main source.