It is indeed an ethnicity. When it is to their advantage, they pretend to be white, speak in the name of being white, and commit acts of fraud and slander in the name of being white. It's common knowledge amongst themselves they don't consider themselves as being white, but genetically different and superior. But, how dare you for recognizing and discussing it.
Judaism is not Hebraism. Jews are not Israelites. Jesus was not a Jew, nor did He practice Judaism, which did not exist at the time.
Most Christians don't realize Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is and Christianity has NEVER been based on Judaism. This is a inconvenient truth that is publicly a taboo subject. Believe it or not, Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. The proof is of course in writing and can be found in Judaism's foundational Passover text.
The claim that Judaism commemorates the Passover of the Old Testament is
as nonsensical as the one that asserts that Judaism's "Noahide Laws" are
based on Noah, the Biblical patriarch who is mocked and degraded in
Orthodox Judaism. Judaism's foundational Passover text is not from the Old Testament but rather the Haggadah, a thoroughly Talmudic work. (M. Hoffman III, "Judaism Discovered"). The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence. In it we learn:
In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud:
"Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to BECOME a people of the book, or they would disappear.
Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.
Herod's temple in Jesus time was a far disparate cry from Solomon's temple. One has to ponder the reason why Jesus became so angry as to turn over the tables at the temple and to state-- "It is written,” He said to them, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’” Using ropes, he whipped everyone from the temple courtyards, including animals and oxen; he dispersed the coins of the money changers and threw their tables to the ground. One could simply say they had strayed from the path, lost their bearings, and settled for much too little, but there seems to be much more to this than just unsavory money-changers cheapening the place of worship.
Within 40 years, the Romans raided Jerusalem under General Vesparian and subdued it. Four years later, the Emperor Titus had the temple disassembled and every stone was removed. Several sources (Roman, Greek, and Jewish, etc.) record that the Romans completely erased the Temple from its existence where "No stone was left unturned". The Romans destroyed and carried away every last piece of the Temple in AD 70.
In 2000 years of research, excavation and exploration including a protracted search by the Templars, not ONE single artifact from the Temples of Jerusalem has ever been found. Even the inscription found at Hezikiah's tunnel far from the alleged temple mount gives proof that the Haram is NOT the site. The overwhelming evidence continues to prove the Dome of the Rock location is NOT the location where Solomon's temple once existed. Yet, the Temple mount will continue to be the site of the proposed 3rd temple.
Knowing this, it's preposterous to believe that the Romans would leave a fortified wall; the so-called "Wailing Wall", for people to worship at, when the records clearly state that all traces of the temple were completely removed. It is clearly a Herodian structure. Flavius Josephus who as a child worshiped in the temple and saw the destruction of it wrote that nothing was left. Every stone was hauled away. It was as if the temple never existed.
Why am I writing this? These are powerful examples of 'something' very wrong, to which Jesus was so angered and later the Romans completely dismantled and removed every last stone of this temple. Something more has to be going on. The money-changers are one of the obvious symptoms to what is 'wrong' with the temple.
Jesus repeatedly showed His care for children and even raised a little girl from the dead. He said -- " But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
"So it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones perish."
In modern times, we know the worship of Moloch is very much alive and well. We know ritual sacrifices of children is widespread. Investigative reporter Laura Logan explains the depth of this reality with Diamond and Silk.. We were led to believe all of this was something that occurred in the distant past, but we now know it has continued throughout the centuries. Even the satanic church has filed lawsuits in more than one State claiming abortions are sacrifices and part of their religious beliefs.
Was the temple the Romans destroyed practicing the child sacrifices? Was it an inner circle secret?
Every aspect of the 3rd temple, if and when it is built, will be a forgery. And we know what this means......
It is indeed an ethnicity. When it is to their advantage, they pretend to be white, speak in the name of being white, and commit acts of fraud and slander in the name of being white. It's common knowledge amongst themselves they don't consider themselves as being white, but genetically different and superior. But, how dare you for recognizing and discussing it.
Judaism is not Hebraism. Jews are not Israelites. Jesus was not a Jew, nor did He practice Judaism, which did not exist at the time.
Most Christians don't realize Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is and Christianity has NEVER been based on Judaism. This is a inconvenient truth that is publicly a taboo subject. Believe it or not, Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. The proof is of course in writing and can be found in Judaism's foundational Passover text.
The claim that Judaism commemorates the Passover of the Old Testament is as nonsensical as the one that asserts that Judaism's "Noahide Laws" are based on Noah, the Biblical patriarch who is mocked and degraded in Orthodox Judaism. Judaism's foundational Passover text is not from the Old Testament but rather the Haggadah, a thoroughly Talmudic work. (M. Hoffman III, "Judaism Discovered"). The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence. In it we learn:
In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud:
"Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to BECOME a people of the book, or they would disappear.
Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.
Wow. Thx for this.
Herod's temple in Jesus time was a far disparate cry from Solomon's temple. One has to ponder the reason why Jesus became so angry as to turn over the tables at the temple and to state-- "It is written,” He said to them, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’” Using ropes, he whipped everyone from the temple courtyards, including animals and oxen; he dispersed the coins of the money changers and threw their tables to the ground. One could simply say they had strayed from the path, lost their bearings, and settled for much too little, but there seems to be much more to this than just unsavory money-changers cheapening the place of worship.
Within 40 years, the Romans raided Jerusalem under General Vesparian and subdued it. Four years later, the Emperor Titus had the temple disassembled and every stone was removed. Several sources (Roman, Greek, and Jewish, etc.) record that the Romans completely erased the Temple from its existence where "No stone was left unturned". The Romans destroyed and carried away every last piece of the Temple in AD 70.
In 2000 years of research, excavation and exploration including a protracted search by the Templars, not ONE single artifact from the Temples of Jerusalem has ever been found. Even the inscription found at Hezikiah's tunnel far from the alleged temple mount gives proof that the Haram is NOT the site. The overwhelming evidence continues to prove the Dome of the Rock location is NOT the location where Solomon's temple once existed. Yet, the Temple mount will continue to be the site of the proposed 3rd temple.
Knowing this, it's preposterous to believe that the Romans would leave a fortified wall; the so-called "Wailing Wall", for people to worship at, when the records clearly state that all traces of the temple were completely removed. It is clearly a Herodian structure. Flavius Josephus who as a child worshiped in the temple and saw the destruction of it wrote that nothing was left. Every stone was hauled away. It was as if the temple never existed.
Why am I writing this? These are powerful examples of 'something' very wrong, to which Jesus was so angered and later the Romans completely dismantled and removed every last stone of this temple. Something more has to be going on. The money-changers are one of the obvious symptoms to what is 'wrong' with the temple.
Jesus repeatedly showed His care for children and even raised a little girl from the dead. He said -- " But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
"So it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones perish."
In modern times, we know the worship of Moloch is very much alive and well. We know ritual sacrifices of children is widespread. Investigative reporter Laura Logan explains the depth of this reality with Diamond and Silk.. We were led to believe all of this was something that occurred in the distant past, but we now know it has continued throughout the centuries. Even the satanic church has filed lawsuits in more than one State claiming abortions are sacrifices and part of their religious beliefs.
Was the temple the Romans destroyed practicing the child sacrifices? Was it an inner circle secret?
Every aspect of the 3rd temple, if and when it is built, will be a forgery. And we know what this means......