Why are folks getting all worked up about someone conceding (or not conceding) an election? Conceding doesn't mean if the numbers change to your favor (because of fraud or cheating) you still wouldn't win the election, would it? It seems to me that conceding (or not) is irrelevant.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
It means that the one who lost concedes not only to the race but, also the validity of the election itself. No audit or investigation will happen. This is why it is such a big deal but, you already know this.
It means you are done....even if something happens to reveal that you actually won...you could concede a battle to win a war... In negotiations and at meditations you may give concessions in order to reach a deal...
Yes, see the recent SCOTUS ruling in regards to Ritter getting fucked in PA:
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ritter-v-migliori-2/
Wrap your head around this one. Court rules that PA cheated Ritter out of his race. But they render the case moot. Why? Not because PA illegally installed his opponent [official reason given] but because Ritter foolishly conceded.
This.