I don't know why you go on about malaria, which is a rare disease in the U.S. and could never have accounted for the number of Covid deaths. The "resources" are hydroxychloroquine, which is cheap and readily available---unless the government puts it out of reach. What msn propaganda? You are jumping into a puddle of ignorance.
For your information---because you will never suspect this otherwise---I was following the bungled handling from the beginning. My "tell" was the bogus information they provided about HCQ. It was also beginning to be apparent that the recommended early treatment (let it get worse to the point of death) was wrong and that the late treatment (homicide by intubation and remdesivir) was also wrong. The vaccines were wrong, which is why my wife and I avoided them like the death they would be (to me particularly, as I have a sensitivity to clotting). I also made an early attempt to disentangle the data on deaths due to Covid, influenza, and pneumonia, and discovered that the key data (isolated Covid deaths) was missing---so it was clear that there was conflation of cause.
But, because I am not an idiot, I did not arrive at the conclusion that "there was no Covid." Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (RIP) did not arrive at that conclusion, and developed his life-saving protocol. Other doctors similarly came out in the same way, strongly supporting the life-saving HCQ and Ivermectin. Are they idiots? I don't think so. I think you should have second thoughts, because you are not in good company. In Zambia, malaria is common and flu is well known---but people were being killed by Covid (admittedly, by the administrative protocol). It was NOT malaria that killed anyone. HCQ use is widespread and probably accounted for the relatively low incidence of Covid there.
I didn't base any information on "msm propaganda," but you sure seem to be pulling fantasy out of thin air to think there was literally nothing going on.
Yes malaria is rare in the U.S.A but apparently you miss the part I wrote about Bill gates dumping millions of malaria ridden mosquitos in places like Texas, Florida, and Louisiana, just to name a few. He also did this in many other countries.
Bioweapons don't work on 1st world countries. Covid-19 doesn't exist. This was a ploy, plain and simple so that no counters to malaria could be implemented
The jab ( I refuse to call them vaccines) is a chemical weapon based on shards of microscopic metal. They aren't little robots engineered to change you DNA. That is a lie to discredit us.
The masks contain graphen oxides (know to be toxic) They forced ppl to wear these masks so that they can get sick and thus simulating the symptoms of a fake outbreak and adding to the pandemic lie
I never said Ivermectin or HCQ (both used to treat malaria) didn't work. I have said the OPPOSITE. These drugs were effective because of the fact that covid-19 was actually malaria. You are the one spewing the lie that covid-19 is real.
Your misrepresentation of my comments are suspicious to say the least and if this last reply doesn't make you change your tune about my stance, then you sir will be ignored.
Last note: because 1/3rd of the jabs are deadly, ppl will begin to see mass heart related deaths. We are only seeing the beginning.
Malaria is rare because the conditions for its propagation are rare. And it is detectable as such, without any confusion with other diseases. Bill Gates bringing millions of mosquitoes is a fantasy.
Bioweapons are designed to work on human beings, not on economies. Pretty funny that smart guys like Didier Raoult and Vladimir Zelenko didn't understand there was no virus and therefore developed their treatments on the basis of nothing whatsoever. (In other words, you are talking through your hat.)
I will agree it is a chemical weapon, but it is called mRNA and it causes the body to produce the protein spikes, which are insidious and pernicious. The metal bits are not good, but are an open question.
The masks are useless and futile and promote the cultivation of bacteria, which is enough to cause serious problems. Corpses of people who died from the 1918 flu epidemic have been found with evidence that the people died of pneumonia rather than the flu. The masks had been killing them. Anything can be toxic at a certain concentration (e.g., water and oxygen). (And I am not talking about drowning.)
I never said you said that HCQ and Ivermectin didn't work. The drugs were effective because they were zinc ionophores, and zinc present in the cells prevents virus replication. This is the Zelenko insight. It had nothing to do with cures when the problem was definitely NOT malaria (as in Zambia, where everyone knows the signs of malaria). It is commonplace for conspiracy zealots to declare that certain facts of existence are not real. It seems to be a necessary closure to the need for a paranoid assessment of the world: replace facts with fantasy. But Zelenko pointed out that if caught too late, HCQ etc. would not be as effective and other therapeutics would be needed. Hard to reconcile "it doesn't exist" with "the Zelenko cure works." How can you cure something that doesn't exist?
I'm not misrepresenting anything. I don't have the time or energy to bother doing that. I'm just throwing your own words---and their implications---back at you. You own the logic as well as the words. But since you don't know malaria from the flu, and you dismiss those who absolutely know malaria from the flu---and who never fall that ill from either---then I conclude you are a bit of a hothouse orchid, and I am the cold draft of air that you don't flourish in.
I don't know why you go on about malaria, which is a rare disease in the U.S. and could never have accounted for the number of Covid deaths. The "resources" are hydroxychloroquine, which is cheap and readily available---unless the government puts it out of reach. What msn propaganda? You are jumping into a puddle of ignorance.
For your information---because you will never suspect this otherwise---I was following the bungled handling from the beginning. My "tell" was the bogus information they provided about HCQ. It was also beginning to be apparent that the recommended early treatment (let it get worse to the point of death) was wrong and that the late treatment (homicide by intubation and remdesivir) was also wrong. The vaccines were wrong, which is why my wife and I avoided them like the death they would be (to me particularly, as I have a sensitivity to clotting). I also made an early attempt to disentangle the data on deaths due to Covid, influenza, and pneumonia, and discovered that the key data (isolated Covid deaths) was missing---so it was clear that there was conflation of cause.
But, because I am not an idiot, I did not arrive at the conclusion that "there was no Covid." Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (RIP) did not arrive at that conclusion, and developed his life-saving protocol. Other doctors similarly came out in the same way, strongly supporting the life-saving HCQ and Ivermectin. Are they idiots? I don't think so. I think you should have second thoughts, because you are not in good company. In Zambia, malaria is common and flu is well known---but people were being killed by Covid (admittedly, by the administrative protocol). It was NOT malaria that killed anyone. HCQ use is widespread and probably accounted for the relatively low incidence of Covid there.
I didn't base any information on "msm propaganda," but you sure seem to be pulling fantasy out of thin air to think there was literally nothing going on.
Last note: because 1/3rd of the jabs are deadly, ppl will begin to see mass heart related deaths. We are only seeing the beginning.
End transmission
Malaria is rare because the conditions for its propagation are rare. And it is detectable as such, without any confusion with other diseases. Bill Gates bringing millions of mosquitoes is a fantasy.
Bioweapons are designed to work on human beings, not on economies. Pretty funny that smart guys like Didier Raoult and Vladimir Zelenko didn't understand there was no virus and therefore developed their treatments on the basis of nothing whatsoever. (In other words, you are talking through your hat.)
I will agree it is a chemical weapon, but it is called mRNA and it causes the body to produce the protein spikes, which are insidious and pernicious. The metal bits are not good, but are an open question.
The masks are useless and futile and promote the cultivation of bacteria, which is enough to cause serious problems. Corpses of people who died from the 1918 flu epidemic have been found with evidence that the people died of pneumonia rather than the flu. The masks had been killing them. Anything can be toxic at a certain concentration (e.g., water and oxygen). (And I am not talking about drowning.)
I never said you said that HCQ and Ivermectin didn't work. The drugs were effective because they were zinc ionophores, and zinc present in the cells prevents virus replication. This is the Zelenko insight. It had nothing to do with cures when the problem was definitely NOT malaria (as in Zambia, where everyone knows the signs of malaria). It is commonplace for conspiracy zealots to declare that certain facts of existence are not real. It seems to be a necessary closure to the need for a paranoid assessment of the world: replace facts with fantasy. But Zelenko pointed out that if caught too late, HCQ etc. would not be as effective and other therapeutics would be needed. Hard to reconcile "it doesn't exist" with "the Zelenko cure works." How can you cure something that doesn't exist?
I'm not misrepresenting anything. I don't have the time or energy to bother doing that. I'm just throwing your own words---and their implications---back at you. You own the logic as well as the words. But since you don't know malaria from the flu, and you dismiss those who absolutely know malaria from the flu---and who never fall that ill from either---then I conclude you are a bit of a hothouse orchid, and I am the cold draft of air that you don't flourish in.