Yeah that was kinda lame. But maybe it's to separate himself from Trump, and get non-Trump supporters to listen to the message he was saying about certain people he talked about in his monologue?
Information warfare. Same reason why it had to be black people talking about the Jews in power. If it was white people speaking about it, it would have less of an impact because the media already convinced leftists that white people are racist.
Not only that, but the Russian collusion narrative is easily debunked, even using (disparate) mainstream sources to piece it together.
If normies waken to Trump being a so-called “honest liar” with regards to calling out a rigged system and trying to fix it, then it can get some people to stop thinking of Trump as some chronically unhinged narcissist responsible for all of society’s ills.
If Chapelle challenges this one media narrative in a logical and agreeable way, but leaves the rest, then it paves the way for normies, over time, to challenge other narratives themselves.
And leaving the easiest to challenge narratives for the normies to discover themselves is brilliant.
Honestly, this Chappelle monologue is one of the more energizing wins of the last couple years, IMO.
Awakening NPCs can process one conspiracy at a time. That's why I never "cross conspiracy streams", so to speak, when talking to them about an issue.
It's important that the "goto" credible person for the truth/conspiracy on a certain matter doesn't open a second front. You should rest assured that they aren't dumb or partially awakened--rather they realize the credibility predicament they'd be in if they crossed the streams.
For example, Robert Malone would stay on track on the vaccines and never bring up something like 9/11 or Ukraine or election fraud.
Pulitzer stays in the voting fraud lane.
Pierre Kory stays in the Ivermectin lane.
Ye stays in the Pedowood lane.
Scott Ritter stays in the foreign policy lane.
Andy Ngo stays in the ANTIFA lane.
Liz Crokin is in the Pizzagate lane.
etc. etc. etc.
It's only as anons that we have the freedom to fully explore all these conspiracies and how they tie together.
Agreed, I've found out myself that it's easy to give awakening sheep "redpill indigestion" if you try too much too fast. Then they spit everything out and go back to pretending that everything is fine.
Yeah I think either of those seems logical.
He shoved the important part in everyone’s face though which is trump said “yeah I’m dirty - the system let’s me be dirty, everyone up here is dirty they just won’t admit it to you because then they’d be forced to change the problem”
Yeah that was kinda lame. But maybe it's to separate himself from Trump, and get non-Trump supporters to listen to the message he was saying about certain people he talked about in his monologue?
Information warfare. Same reason why it had to be black people talking about the Jews in power. If it was white people speaking about it, it would have less of an impact because the media already convinced leftists that white people are racist.
exactly!!
Not only that, but the Russian collusion narrative is easily debunked, even using (disparate) mainstream sources to piece it together.
If normies waken to Trump being a so-called “honest liar” with regards to calling out a rigged system and trying to fix it, then it can get some people to stop thinking of Trump as some chronically unhinged narcissist responsible for all of society’s ills.
If Chapelle challenges this one media narrative in a logical and agreeable way, but leaves the rest, then it paves the way for normies, over time, to challenge other narratives themselves.
And leaving the easiest to challenge narratives for the normies to discover themselves is brilliant.
Honestly, this Chappelle monologue is one of the more energizing wins of the last couple years, IMO.
I agree. Too much dooming simply because Dave didn't go against the mainstream narrative on every single reference.
Awakening NPCs can process one conspiracy at a time. That's why I never "cross conspiracy streams", so to speak, when talking to them about an issue.
It's important that the "goto" credible person for the truth/conspiracy on a certain matter doesn't open a second front. You should rest assured that they aren't dumb or partially awakened--rather they realize the credibility predicament they'd be in if they crossed the streams.
For example, Robert Malone would stay on track on the vaccines and never bring up something like 9/11 or Ukraine or election fraud.
Pulitzer stays in the voting fraud lane.
Pierre Kory stays in the Ivermectin lane.
Ye stays in the Pedowood lane.
Scott Ritter stays in the foreign policy lane.
Andy Ngo stays in the ANTIFA lane.
Liz Crokin is in the Pizzagate lane.
etc. etc. etc.
It's only as anons that we have the freedom to fully explore all these conspiracies and how they tie together.
Agreed, I've found out myself that it's easy to give awakening sheep "redpill indigestion" if you try too much too fast. Then they spit everything out and go back to pretending that everything is fine.
Yeah I think either of those seems logical. He shoved the important part in everyone’s face though which is trump said “yeah I’m dirty - the system let’s me be dirty, everyone up here is dirty they just won’t admit it to you because then they’d be forced to change the problem”