All this is, is dehumanization garbage that achieves nothing other than division. Not only is it untrue, but even if it were true, it benefits us preciously zero to acknowledge and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason.
I think ArtemisY was taking some hyperbolic licence with the “no longer technically human” part. The “artificially altering DNA” part, though, is very much still on the table.
DNA has been shown to be modified by Pfizer jabs in vitro in the now famous Swedish study.
Sure, Reuters debunked it. Nothing to do with the ex-Reuters CEO Jamie Dimon being on the Pfizer board, I’m sure, and various other nefarious connections.
Such as when the BioNTech CEO admitted on camera he hadn’t taken the jab yet, Reuters still torturously fact checked this to the point of blatant lies.
“According to Reuters fact checkers, Dr. Sahin of BioNTech did not admit that he is unjabbed. That’s right. Despite the fact you heard him say exactly that with your own ears, Reuters is claiming that you are wrong, and Sahin himself is wrong, and the BioNTech CEO is vaccinated with his own product, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. As per usual, the Reuters fact checking team provides precisely zero evidence to back up their wild claims. Despite this, Facebook and other social media platforms will not allow anybody to contradict what Reuters are saying about Sahin’s vaccination status.”
Thank you. I misremembered. It’s James C Smith. Wrong globalist elite scumbag James. While I hate blindly testing my memory privately then failing publicly, at least the thrust of my point wasn’t lost. But it is important to be thorough.
If it were, go ahead and spout it out as much as you want to no benefit if not detriment. Likely detriment. Notice I didn't say "not ok" or "you can't do this". The right time to tell particular truths is not always immediately when learned, unfortunately. In a perfect world it would be, but the world is not perfect.
Certain truths at the wrong time will just drive away the people you're trying to convince. You have to soften them up first with stuff that doesn't hit so hard before hitting them with the real hard shit.
To be clear, I'm talking about telling this kind of shit to other people. Hence, "and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason". If what is said is true, I don't give a shit if it's shared here in particular. That's why we're here.
Now while that's all well and good, none of it applies here to begin with because what he said isn't true. If it was true, I likely wouldn't have said anything as I assume it's a given that you don't lead a conversation with normies by saying "you're not a Human anymore, and therefore I'm genetically superior to you", even if true. Only mentioned it as a side note to my main point, which is that the claim is false.
Common sense. What does it mean to be human. Are people born retarded not human? Are people born outside the “average” or “normal” not human? What stupidity.
No it isn't. This isn't how being Human works.
All this is, is dehumanization garbage that achieves nothing other than division. Not only is it untrue, but even if it were true, it benefits us preciously zero to acknowledge and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason.
I think ArtemisY was taking some hyperbolic licence with the “no longer technically human” part. The “artificially altering DNA” part, though, is very much still on the table.
DNA has been shown to be modified by Pfizer jabs in vitro in the now famous Swedish study.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Sure, Reuters debunked it. Nothing to do with the ex-Reuters CEO Jamie Dimon being on the Pfizer board, I’m sure, and various other nefarious connections.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-dna-idUSL2N2VQ2OU
Such as when the BioNTech CEO admitted on camera he hadn’t taken the jab yet, Reuters still torturously fact checked this to the point of blatant lies.
“According to Reuters fact checkers, Dr. Sahin of BioNTech did not admit that he is unjabbed. That’s right. Despite the fact you heard him say exactly that with your own ears, Reuters is claiming that you are wrong, and Sahin himself is wrong, and the BioNTech CEO is vaccinated with his own product, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. As per usual, the Reuters fact checking team provides precisely zero evidence to back up their wild claims. Despite this, Facebook and other social media platforms will not allow anybody to contradict what Reuters are saying about Sahin’s vaccination status.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/safe-and-effective-man-who-invented?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Even mainstream normie rag Spectator is touting DNA damage as a possible outcome from the Pfizer jabs on account of the weird shit in them.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2022/11/wots-in-the-shots/
Does changing the DNA with a patented shit make them "owned" by the patent holder?
Just a note: Jamie Dimon is the current CEO of JP Morgan Chase Bank and has been for over 30 years.
Thank you. I misremembered. It’s James C Smith. Wrong globalist elite scumbag James. While I hate blindly testing my memory privately then failing publicly, at least the thrust of my point wasn’t lost. But it is important to be thorough.
No worries! Jamie Dimon is a corrupt scumbag as well. Excellent point! Thank you
So the truth is only ok when it makes us feel good? Sounds like a perfect example of libtard logic to me…
Again, it's not true.
If it were, go ahead and spout it out as much as you want to no benefit if not detriment. Likely detriment. Notice I didn't say "not ok" or "you can't do this". The right time to tell particular truths is not always immediately when learned, unfortunately. In a perfect world it would be, but the world is not perfect.
Certain truths at the wrong time will just drive away the people you're trying to convince. You have to soften them up first with stuff that doesn't hit so hard before hitting them with the real hard shit.
To be clear, I'm talking about telling this kind of shit to other people. Hence, "and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason". If what is said is true, I don't give a shit if it's shared here in particular. That's why we're here.
Now while that's all well and good, none of it applies here to begin with because what he said isn't true. If it was true, I likely wouldn't have said anything as I assume it's a given that you don't lead a conversation with normies by saying "you're not a Human anymore, and therefore I'm genetically superior to you", even if true. Only mentioned it as a side note to my main point, which is that the claim is false.
Common sense. What does it mean to be human. Are people born retarded not human? Are people born outside the “average” or “normal” not human? What stupidity.