I’ve discussed Juan a few times and it always ruffles Anon’s feathers about him being a “grifter”, or him being full of crap, or just a typical “Truther” with no real connections. But did you Anons realize that in the current world of our Digital War, we have digital Truther fakery going on? Yes we do! And it’s to CONFUSE PEOPLE that don’t listen, just impulsively respond to a title of a post, and certainly don’t do their own Research!
So to each and every one of you I present 100% proof there are two Juan O’Savins. They both don’t show their faces but mostly boots or an outside scene. Both talk about very similar events around the same time, but have extravagant differences IF, IF You The Listener take the time to LISTEN, and Carefully Process What is said and What is not said, but Implied. Below I have the two links to show you, and will summarize what to listen for to tell the difference between the FAKE Juan, and the REAL Juan.
The Real Juan: The Real Kid By The Side Of The Road Juan O’Savin, pronounced One-Oh-Seven, or 1-Oh-7, also referred to as 17. David Nino Rodriguez only meets with this Juan, and calls him One-ee-toe, not Wan-ee-toe. Must listen carefully. How do I know he is the real deal. One, the way he sounds: Low gravely voice with a gravely laugh. What he talks about: The real Juan states and connects current events, info, Intel, and especially high level Biblical references in an extremely intelligent Game and String Theory, Robin Williams or Jordan Peterson-like way. His information is so on point or incredible sounding, it nearly sounds like what Normies refer to as Conspiracy BS.
If you’ve read William Cooper’s “Behold A Pale Horse”, you just might swear you hear this version of Juan talking the same manner. His book Kid By The Side Of The Road exactly matches not only his Game/String Theory speech and ideas, but is highly detailed in history and events most people don’t connect easily, and has a whole chapter on what Q is. Last, we have actually seen this Juan in person now. So he’s not a hidden face anymore.
https://rumble.com/vo9b9z-i-see-you-juan-o-savin.html
Okay, now to the fake Juan: Easy to tell them apart if you now listen to the link provided below. No gravely voice or laugh, more high pitched, and he talks very easily and clearly about subjects. Though he also talks in a Game Theory manner, it is very simplified, and his Biblical referencing is NO-WHERE-NEAR The Level of intelligence or deep connection that our first Juan presents. This Juan also tends to datefag every few shows, where as the 1st Juan only made that mistake once, being right after the 2020 election. Our 1st Juan hasn’t done so since.
They both appear to put on a similar number of shows but only with certain “Truthers” each. The fake Juan also does his own alone shows on Rumble and YouTube, while the real Juan does not do alone shows, except for shorts, on his own podcast site. Last, this Juan does not have a book, and we’ve NEVER seen his face, nor has this one ever talked about him showing up live in Las Vegas. FOR THE IMPULSIVE ADHD BRAINS FLAMING ME ABOUT THE F-ing BEGINNING of the below video link, FAST-THE-F-FORWARD IN THE BELOW VIDEO to the 2ish minute mark, TO F-ing hear the DIFFERENT PERSON from the intro guy, and PAY ATTENTION!!
https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
Okay Anons, there you have this piece of the puzzle, connecting to my last entry I did on the real Juan here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6zdrzN7/kid-by-the-side-of-the-road-theo/
I will be dropping the final entry with thee cookie crumbs once we are at the right point, so stay tuned. Thank you all, God bless your hard work for Where We Go One We Go All, together.
Let me explain why feathers get ruffled.
People have a lifetime of well-informed opinions, the older one gets the better their discernment becomes.
When someone asks you to reserve judgement and just listen to what someone has to say, what they're really asking for is to remove all discernment.
Like this ...
You're asking me to set aside what I already know. What do I already know?
You want me to set aside a lifetime of well-informed opinion to see whether Juan is legit or not? Why? Why should I set aside the above red flags?
If Juan has information that is so vital, he can make it past my filters. Except there's the problem.
He has no information that can be verified. Everything is unverifiable, by design.
I've listened to Juan. He'll make some statement of fact that is completely unverifiable. An example: papers have been drawn so they can arrest Trump any time they want.
Sauce? Nope. Because he's Juan TrustmebrO'Savin. Not only will he refuse to provide sauce, he's not even going to infer how he would know such a thing. "I have confidential sources who told me" ... nope. Won't even say that.
Juan TrustmebrO'Savin. Because everything he says is maximum "trust me bro".
Q followers value anonymity and information that can be sourced.
Some dude who needs to make a name for himself and provide statements of fact that are not sourced are the complete antithesis of the Q movement.
And now I've come to understand, through you, that there's two Juans? You've only added to the red flags.
Why don't you try extrapolating something Juan says that you think is important, research it to verify it is correct, provide the sauce to it and then just post the information?
Because you can't.
No outside comms!
We can't verify most of what he says, nor can we verify what any other patriot influencer is saying either. Can we really verify that the new Q posts that are recently posted are the original / real Q / MIL INT team from 2017 - 2020? I think the answer to that is no. If you read the qresearch forum on 8kun you'll see there is a heavy divide on the 6/6/2022 Q post after the long hiatus, a lot of people aren't convinced that's even Q because we weren't getting the Trump 0 deltas like we were in the first Trump term and SALT rotation issues related to the post authentication (Many think Ron Watkins hacked the board for the new Q Posts). To add to this line of thinking, if we assume that you can count the people who have the complete map/plan of what's to come on 2 hands, (and we know that Trump and his military guys don't telegraph their moves), then it's probably reasonable to assume IF Juan is legitimate, if he's on the outer periphery and getting information from the inner core of the MIL INT teams when they deem it safe and timely to provide it, it may not be exactly what we were expecting or when we were expecting it. But does this mean he's a grifter and lying? No, not yet because future proves past.
Past Juan Predictions I've picked up on:
Many of these predictions he's been calling before they've happened. Russia invading Ukraine is checked off the list. Honestly all other bullet points look like they are queued up and ready to go real soon. So if he's a lying grifter, maybe none of these other predictions will come to fruition but if this list starts to get checked off over the next 6 months or year, it's probably wise to listen to what he has to say going forward.
The one "prediction" you mentioned happening is moot. The war was already on going for 9 years at that point....
So, he's nil for nil so far.
Now look where we are. Trump indictment, banks are collapsing (just beginning) and complete financial collapse looming. It's playing out exactly as he has been saying for the past few years. I think the stage is set for the nuclear scare event and the Taiwan/China conflict.
Relevant response to another anon
Re: the "new Q" posts - Scavino immediately posted a photo of a baby's fist, twice (and it's the very first "baby fist" photo on google search), after the return of Q. Clearly, he was trying to signal that Q was somehow involved with the 8kun user named babyfist and the forum drama surrounding that. Q's purpose was fulfilled anyway - we have more than we know.
As for Juan, he's definitely a LARP paytriot, trying to pass as an insider and JFK Jr. I can't believe I wasted my time watching that stupid roadtrip movie of his last year :\
Name another "qanon influencer" who makes unverifiable statements of fact and I'll tell you how they are also full of shit.
I trust that Trump is in tune enough with what is happening with the Q movement that, when he retruthed "PUT AN END TO THE ENDLESS", he knew exactly that it was something from a recent Q post and did it anyway.
Is that perfect verification? Maybe not. But it's a million times better than anything Juan TrustmebrO'Savin provides to back up his statements of fact.
Explain how, when Q told us no outside comms, do we have a need for someone on the "outer periphery" to send us comms?
When a bulk majority of the Q movement think he's a bullshit grifter anyway, what good is he?
Everyone, including the bad guys, said Russia would invade Ukraine.
Every other "hasn't happened yet" is not usable for confirmation, especially because Juan leaves it open to both ways.
Like when he said they just signed papers saying Trump could be arrested at any time, he also said they might not use those papers.
Well I'll be damned, that covers 100% of any scenario that happens, I guess he's a prophet?