Okay, I'm not trying to forum slide, but I have something incredibly stupid I have to know.
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
...Did anyone ever ask Q what Covfefe meant before s/he went dark?
Others here have covered "covfefe" adequately, so I will address another part of your question, about "before s/he went dark." I think the common belief here is that Q is not a person, but rather a team consisting of fewer than 10 people, some of whom are in military intelligence. Whenever I see Q referred to as an individual in the negative MSM reports, I think the author(s) knows NOTHING about Q.
It first dawned on me that Q was not a single person was about a year into the posts when the tone (or "voice") changed from phrases and talking points, to more fully formed sentences and vocabulary. Then it changed again to a different writing style.
I'm sensitive to such things because for many years I worked as a technical writer and technical editor of scientific documents. I came to believe that whoever was writing those posts were at least 3 different people. Much later came the widespread belief in this community that Q was made up of fewer than 10 persons, some of whom served in military intelligence.
I hope that helps.
That's very interesting. What do you think about the writer of the new Q posts?
Great question. To me the last few drops have either been by the original Q poster, or someone who emulates that style. We could speculate all day as to why different posters were active over the past 5 years but we would probably be wrong.
Duty assignments, personnel reshuffling, even prosaic causes like illness, vacation, or family matters could be in play. We may never know the full story of the Q Team until after The Plan has been thoroughly fulfilled and the books are written and the players come forward.
And if the military intelligence members are psy-op operators, we may NEVER know who they are.
But rather than focus on "who is Q" I think it is more important to not lose sight of the actual drops and what they mean. Just my 2-cents' worth.
Thanks. I'm not focusing at all on who is Q, rather whether new Q is legit.
Got it. So I do believe the current Q is of the original Q team, so yes, I believe the drops are legitimate. Of course we are all entitled to our opinions, and that is mine.
It's convenient to speak of Q as an individual. The alternative is what? Every time you say Q include a lesson about how Q is probably a group and maybe even Trump, at times. But Trump is actually thought to be Q+.
Maybe Q's pronouns are "them" and "they"? 8>)
...maybe it's an ai?
Granted it would be the first ai that the internet didn't turn into a nazi, but...