Was just reading another thread about Elon saying, "The more I learn, the worse it gets." Everyone is hoping he will reveal all.
My question is, does he really know or have access, to everything? Couldn't all those who left (and there were many) have taken or deleted or destroyed a lot of the evidence of what was going on there?
Btw, I started this thread because the other already had so many replies and I thought nobody would see my question. I know many people here aren't technologically proficient, so it would be reassuring to hear that he can get his hands on the info. Thanks.
Q team has it all, as in, Comms-Aware Patriots, mostly military.
Often I ask GAW to toss their ego aside. The Comms-Aware live in a different world than we do, they see the world as it really is. We have lived under illusion under illusion our entire lives. There are so many layers, that anons here have only started to be able to identify the true enemy.
Q talks to us as if we are children. Because in the context of a child learning to interpret their surroundings for the first time, we are. We are worse off than that metaphor however. A child would be a blank slate. We have so much to unlearn.
I was just cleaning my P-85 a couple days ago, salute.
I have no expectation of seeing real change in my lifetime, I'm near 70 and have been in this over 50 years now. 'Q' pointed us to some things I was not aware of but much of it we have known for decades, we just cannot force resolution against Evil. As my Lovely Wife reminds me, we will not defeat Evil until Christ returns.
I keep hoping we can eliminate some of the mortals doing Evil's work but look around at our Society - we don't do that either.
I think you sell 'us' short - many of us have known the false nature of government for a long long time, before 'Q' . Before the interwebs we struggled more slowly, sure, and data was hard to accumulate but we knew to look for it.
"Based on my decoding there are many “Sciences” that are outright lies, and so let’s discuss how that’s even possible.
It’s the scientific community that lends credibility to what is true & false and the MSM is the one that spreads it. It is the rich that decide who gets the science dollars. Therefore it has to be asked, what if objectivity is not the goal?
What if those with money specifically want to give credibility to a lie? Do scientists stand up to this? And if they did, how would we even know? Would MSM take it seriously? Would tech allow it to trend? Are they that noble? Or would they more likely fall under the same marching orders as the fake science funding?"
u/#q1113
Anons have the instinct and the smarts. Call it step 1. But we never progress beyond that point. Why not?
We require a tool to discern more truth about the world. A mental tool. That's what "Learn our Comms" means, and that's never been presented to humans writ large before in our civilization. "Symbolism will be their downfall" = the masses learning how the Comms-Aware have communicated for decades, centuries, to further enrich themselves and remain in power, will be their downfall.
In your decades of digging into the false nature of the government. Have you ever heard of critical thinking performed on whether or not nuclear weapons are as described to us? This is a level of critical-thinking, Q-based discernment, offered by this applying this mental tool.
'We', I don't think that word means what you think it means.
Those mental 'tools' were made necessary for me by the double damned corrupt government in 1969 when busing was brought to us. Reinforced by Vietnam and all the terrorisms of the day.
Joined the USAF to escape the Draft, learned a lot of things there, such as how JFK suckered the Cubans and left them stranded at the Bay of Pigs, how America placed missiles in Turkey which led to Russia placing missiles in Cuba, how LBJ setup the U.S.S. Liberty to be attacked by Israel in the '67 war.
Yeah I learned things, a lot of us learned things. We have known for decades that history was warped, reality not as it seemed, youbetcha.
I worked with nukular weps, our most powerful warhead rode on my missile. I had clearances which allowed me to read things behind classified seals, I talked with people who knew other things.
I cannot read the 'clock' but comms, yeah been keeping up with comms for a long long time now. Not all of them, no one knows it all....
And I just never bothered working through the clock, don't need it.
Just don't be surprised if Great Awakeni g suggests that the Cold War is revealed to have been not the US vs USSR but instead US + USSR vs. Pyramid. And the Cuban Missile Crisis was a publicity stunt done on purpose to boost JFK's sagging poll numbers.
Out of curiosity, why do you think that is? it seems our government hasn't had any trouble (meaning moral reluctance) to go after various mid-easterners - every one from Bin Laden to the one Trump got, (can't spell his name.) So why do you think Trump didn't go after Soros or that ilk?
We haven't gone after many at all, not Feinstein even tho we have evidence she knowingly employed chinese spies for years. We haven't gone after Epstein's clients, or sealed the broders against cartels andother ytraffickers, we haven't gone after the traitors in sanctuary city governments or federal judges who activate from the bench.
Trump famously claimed he would lock up hillary, he did not even consider the act. Why do I think he did not? The short answer is that America doesn't want the Rule of Law any more than we want Free Speech.
Hmm. So do you consider Trump a traitor then? Or maybe just ineffectual? Or part of the problem - or what?