If one explores what Randall Carlson is saying, the younger Dryad was caused by a couple of meteor or comet impacts, which has been verified by a crater that was recently found near Greenland. Most of the Northern Hemisphere has a carbonized layer at that time-period in the geological record. Because the impact was into ice, it also caused extensive flooding as well, which as Carlson shows, there is dramatic record in the Midwest: giant ripples in the landscape, so tall, that the water, which suddenly inundated that land, was very deep and rushing - like a giant tsunami. Geologists were saying that these 'ripples' were a glacial thing, i.e. a retreating ice cap - not a flood thing. However, I agree with Carlson that it looks like wave-like water action, not a gradual melt.
The flood stories are prevalent in creation myths all over the world. This impact had an extraordinary effect on humans. We all have flood at the BEGINNING of our Biblical, or other records - Hancock speaks of amnesia - no real spoken records of anything happening before those floods, except for Adam and Eve, and their offspring, and then we have Noah and the flood as the very next chapter.
However, read for interest, the first few pages of the Bhagavad-Gita, that speaks of a terrible light and fire that wipes out a plain where a mighty battle was taking place - no water - they were at the other end of the earth. In the eighties I wondered if that was an ancient nuclear weapon, but now I think it was that comet the impact of which would have had a destructive sonic and thermal boom that was experienced in India. Some creation myths talk of a feathered serpent who attacked from the sky - a description of a long tailed comet perhaps.
Lol EXACTLY - it's like we were twins separated at birth - except you write far better than I do. It's quite daunting to come face to face with the realisation that just about everything is built on lies. The one bit that I haven't figured out, is why hide all the ancient history (buy up and hide OOPARTS, why the Vatican library is locked down with all of it's amazing treasures of knowledge etc). How does that serve the cabal. What is wrong with knowing that there have been waves of civilisation that ebb and flow? What is wrong with knowing that there were peoples from the South Pacific in S America tens of thousands of years before the Clovis peoples?
I think it serves them to keep stuff hidden because they have a narrative to uphold, and lies beget lies. Have you looked into the archeological sites that are locked to the public in NZ? e.g. http://www.celticnz.co.nz There a paleolithic/astrological observance sites, and even a pyramid, built along Egyptian lines and orientation, that go against the 'there were no people in NZ until the Maori got there' narrative ... There are 'Pakeha' (others?) in the northern Taranaki and King country that claim they have been there forever. Even the Maori speak of a red-haired people that were already living in NZ.
But NVM, there is a claim of we-wuz-indigenous peoples, that they want to implement via the UN. It is one powerful group of elites that have discovered how to influence politicians to get more power. Note that most Maoris don't even agree to all this. Quite disgusting, given all the different people: tiny shy fairy-like people living in caves near Rotorua, 'giant skeletons' found North of Raglan, etc. etc. that are quietly covered up and ignored. The official story is that there are no paleolithic remains, even as the carvings have celtic roots.
I find the level of denial around the Kaimanawa Wall to be most bemusing. I do not see how signs of ancient ruins from great antiquity causes any kind of challenge to Maori views about being the tangata whenua - no reasonable person disputes that when Capt Cook sailed into view Maori were all over the place, so why does an obvious man-made wall from great antiquity constitute such a threat. I do not believe the rest of the world understands how incredibly shut-down and closed-minded NZ has become over the past 20 years. We are a real-world example of Plato's cave.
If one explores what Randall Carlson is saying, the younger Dryad was caused by a couple of meteor or comet impacts, which has been verified by a crater that was recently found near Greenland. Most of the Northern Hemisphere has a carbonized layer at that time-period in the geological record. Because the impact was into ice, it also caused extensive flooding as well, which as Carlson shows, there is dramatic record in the Midwest: giant ripples in the landscape, so tall, that the water, which suddenly inundated that land, was very deep and rushing - like a giant tsunami. Geologists were saying that these 'ripples' were a glacial thing, i.e. a retreating ice cap - not a flood thing. However, I agree with Carlson that it looks like wave-like water action, not a gradual melt.
The flood stories are prevalent in creation myths all over the world. This impact had an extraordinary effect on humans. We all have flood at the BEGINNING of our Biblical, or other records - Hancock speaks of amnesia - no real spoken records of anything happening before those floods, except for Adam and Eve, and their offspring, and then we have Noah and the flood as the very next chapter.
However, read for interest, the first few pages of the Bhagavad-Gita, that speaks of a terrible light and fire that wipes out a plain where a mighty battle was taking place - no water - they were at the other end of the earth. In the eighties I wondered if that was an ancient nuclear weapon, but now I think it was that comet the impact of which would have had a destructive sonic and thermal boom that was experienced in India. Some creation myths talk of a feathered serpent who attacked from the sky - a description of a long tailed comet perhaps.
Lol EXACTLY - it's like we were twins separated at birth - except you write far better than I do. It's quite daunting to come face to face with the realisation that just about everything is built on lies. The one bit that I haven't figured out, is why hide all the ancient history (buy up and hide OOPARTS, why the Vatican library is locked down with all of it's amazing treasures of knowledge etc). How does that serve the cabal. What is wrong with knowing that there have been waves of civilisation that ebb and flow? What is wrong with knowing that there were peoples from the South Pacific in S America tens of thousands of years before the Clovis peoples?
Well thank you for the kind words.
I think it serves them to keep stuff hidden because they have a narrative to uphold, and lies beget lies. Have you looked into the archeological sites that are locked to the public in NZ? e.g. http://www.celticnz.co.nz There a paleolithic/astrological observance sites, and even a pyramid, built along Egyptian lines and orientation, that go against the 'there were no people in NZ until the Maori got there' narrative ... There are 'Pakeha' (others?) in the northern Taranaki and King country that claim they have been there forever. Even the Maori speak of a red-haired people that were already living in NZ.
But NVM, there is a claim of we-wuz-indigenous peoples, that they want to implement via the UN. It is one powerful group of elites that have discovered how to influence politicians to get more power. Note that most Maoris don't even agree to all this. Quite disgusting, given all the different people: tiny shy fairy-like people living in caves near Rotorua, 'giant skeletons' found North of Raglan, etc. etc. that are quietly covered up and ignored. The official story is that there are no paleolithic remains, even as the carvings have celtic roots.
How dare you!!
I find the level of denial around the Kaimanawa Wall to be most bemusing. I do not see how signs of ancient ruins from great antiquity causes any kind of challenge to Maori views about being the tangata whenua - no reasonable person disputes that when Capt Cook sailed into view Maori were all over the place, so why does an obvious man-made wall from great antiquity constitute such a threat. I do not believe the rest of the world understands how incredibly shut-down and closed-minded NZ has become over the past 20 years. We are a real-world example of Plato's cave.
Agreed.