https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/four-videos-to-watch
Steve points out that he "did not fund the film or have any say in the editorial direction of the film." His participation was limited to his speaking part, and he has reservations about some elements of the film. Steve links to and quotes an article by an anon with similar concerns:
Although there was much I appreciated about Died Suddenly (e.g. it touched upon the history of elitist population control which I presented detailed evidence of here alongside a summary of the known previous attempts to develop and deploy sterilizing vaccines on the public), I feel the lack of editorial control will be extremely problematic later on. Since easily falsifiable information exists in the video that will be focused on in any attempt to debunk it, that will significantly weaken its message and allow the vaccine blood clots to be associated with other unprovable conspiracy theories.
This is a shame because the blood clot aspect of the film is so strong and can easily stand on its own. Additionally, I feel it is very likely that when “died suddenly” is searched in the future, instead of the large numbers of news reports emerging that show where this happened, we will instead be greeted with an endless number of articles debunking those parts of the movie.
Stew Peters is controlled opposition...the new Alex Jones. He has promoted all kinds of crazy and easily disproved garbage theories mixed with bits of truth. He's a pied piper to lead patriots away from the real truth and discredit us all.
He was the one who hardcore pushed the snake venom in the water thing from last year
He never said there was actual snake venom in the shot. They said it was a synthetic version that acted like snake venom. If you actually listened to the follow up videos to the reactions to the videos you would know that. sounds like you are the controlled opposition. Go take your shot. you think it's just fine.
Maybe, but he made anti-vaxxers sound crazy and misled.
He knew how it would be twisted.
Yup. Stew is sloppy to the point of it likely being intentional. Agreed he is AJ 2.0. Willfully, or perhaps just through the company he keeps.
What I appreciate though is it's becoming easier to spot these. AJ was very hard for us to spot for so decades but for Stew it was less than a year that people knew that every bit of info from him had to be independently corroborated.
Yes. Watched him a little as he first appeared, and then there were too many inaccurate things being promoted and aligned himself with other people who push only half truths.