I won't be doing that. But just want to know if there is any truth to this to the graphene exposure. If anyone can find any other reports out there on it. Or is it bogus?
Here's an example of occupational exposure -- 8.3.5.1:
A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
So that's the person who has the jab A has contact with B.
B has a female partner, C, who is pregnant or about to get pregnant.
That stuff transmits from A all the way to C.
And possibly to D, the unborn baby.
The investigator must report EDP (exposure during pregnancy) to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.
So does that mean we should put the masks back on? Sheesh
I won't be doing that. But just want to know if there is any truth to this to the graphene exposure. If anyone can find any other reports out there on it. Or is it bogus?
Ask and ye shall receive...
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/design-and-analysis-shedding-studies-virus-or-bacteria-based-gene-therapy-and-oncolytic-products
This is the one you want:
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
Share it, please.
Here's an example of occupational exposure -- 8.3.5.1:
So that's the person who has the jab A has contact with B.
B has a female partner, C, who is pregnant or about to get pregnant.
That stuff transmits from A all the way to C.
And possibly to D, the unborn baby.