Search Results:
file type icon Docket for 22-380
Title: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.
No. 22-380 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari FILED
(Response due November 23, 2022)
It means the government waived their right too offer a response to this filing. Nothing more. They didnt want to waste time with it.
This is being so blown out of proportion its embarrassing. I almost think this is a trojan horse to make us look stupid. Everything in the filing is 100% spot on. However, the USSC does play hot potato with political grenades. They dont. The idea that any law enforcement agency will arrest anyone on that defendant list is delusional. I want it more than most. It aint happening.
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s).
~~
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s).
~~
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
Search Results: file type icon Docket for 22-380 Title: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al. No. 22-380 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari FILED (Response due November 23, 2022)
Nov 23 2022-Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted. https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx?Search=22-380
What does this mean?
It means the government waived their right too offer a response to this filing. Nothing more. They didnt want to waste time with it.
This is being so blown out of proportion its embarrassing. I almost think this is a trojan horse to make us look stupid. Everything in the filing is 100% spot on. However, the USSC does play hot potato with political grenades. They dont. The idea that any law enforcement agency will arrest anyone on that defendant list is delusional. I want it more than most. It aint happening.
It means that we the people have no justice or recourse in law when our elections are obviously stolen in the current system.
Extremely well said fren. You nailed it.
what does this mean? a replies i received:
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s). ~~ Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.
My understanding is that the SC accepted the case.
do u know what this means? "Waiver of United States of right to respond? filed by court 11/23 -- https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx?Search=22-380
what does this mean? a replies i received:
It's the equivalent of pleading the 5th amendment, claiming that the Plaintiff's case has no merit therefore not worthy of response. This way, the defendant(s) don't make any claims or present anything in their defense giving the court the opportunity to dismiss the case for lack of merit while not further incriminating the defendant(s). ~~
Yup. The inference was that the case was so weak they did not even need to respond seriously.