Clandestine-Bioterrorism is alive and well.-link below
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Aren't posts above #4953 suspected of being from a non-Q person? Something about trip codes not matching and most people are disregarding them? Not to rain on your post, OP, but this doesn't sound like the Q that posted between 2017 and 2020.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDcaDHPC/gentle-reminder-to-anons-the-old/c/
And this
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDh8tpLk/lets-have-a-talk-about-new-q-pos/
.
(I didn't down-vote you, btw). So I'm reading up on this issue and lots of pros and cons. Here's one that may support your take (though I'd have liked to actually hear your take other than "no").
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZE4aEKdc/so-you-think-trip-q-is-babyfist-/c/
.
I'm not convinced and you appear to be. Fog of war, I suppose.
Thanks for the clarification of your stance, but I'm thinking more in technical terms. I was not here from the beginning like many of you were; in fact, I didn't find GAW/Q at all until after the 2020 elections and Q had stopped posting by then. I've always been hazy on the technicalities of the trip code (though some really smart anons have taken the time to try and explain it to me). That said - and feel free to correct me - I thought there was some sort of technical threshold that had to be met to verify that the real Q had returned - whether that's this trip code or a combination of that and something else. And this is where I'm not seeing that there's clarity for these recent posts to be considered from the real Q. I'm still reading up on both sides of this, literally hundreds of comments and trying to understand this.
You're obviously of the mindset that whatever threshold the original Q (and, yes, I understand it's a team not a person) set forth before he left (to verify it would be him upon return) has been met. There was a "problem post", but you're saying that was an anomaly and doesn't detract from the validity of the others. I can respect that - no offense was intended in my original comment - but since I'm unclear on the original Q criteria, I'm unable to be convinced at this point in time. Plus... I'm looking at these latest Q posts and they have a decidedly different tone. I've read some commentary here by other anons that this could simply signify we're in a new phase.
In any case. Thank you for taking your time. I don't mean to be chewing up your time, but this fog of war is truly thick. Regards.