I want to see the interviewer ask this question:
"So Ye, I understand your pain. I understand that you were severely wronged. They attacked your wealth, tried to get you thrown in jail, tried to medicate you into a stupor, and threatened to take away your children. Some of the key figures who wronged you in this way happen to be Jewish people. I would like you to explain, for the benefit of myself and the audience, why you believe it is important for us to know about this association, because I believe there might be some misconceptions out there about why this association is being made."
And then LET. YE. TALK. AND EXPLAIN HIS POSITION.
EVERYONE cuts him off and starts griping about "Muh identity politics, muh identitarianism, blah blah blah" and nobody actually lets the man talk and explain why he thinks it's important that we know that the people who wronged him happen to be Jewish people.
I literally was raised Jewish, despite disagreeing with many in my own demographic about a wide range of issues, and I want to hear the man talk. This is getting aggravating!
I just heard about Ye not long ago but never heard any of his interviews. I did ask a friend why he kept mentioning about Jewish people. I was curious too. My friend's answer was "the Jews" Kanye was referring to has nothing to do w/ real Jewish people. He's referring to the "Jewish mafia", It's like the Kazarian mafia, they control it all. They're not real Jewish, they hide behind Judaism as protection. But these elitists belong to a cult.
They are "Jews of Convenience" who use the rest of the Jews as human shields who are programmed to dogpile anyone who dares to insult anyone who claims to be a Jew. That's why Lex Friedman's insistence "name them individually" during his interview of Kanye was infuriating because we already know you'll get dogpiled anyway as Jews still defend their rotten apples and you will get the white knighting from the normies who have "Holocaust Guilt" despite having no connection to it.
"The Jews" Ye is referencing are, imo, real anti Semites who have been described as wolves in sheep's clothing. They use their coopted identity as both a shield and a weapon.
Are they the only ones? Nope. The Death Cult has countless sects and countless well intentioned useful idiot sheep busy building new roads to hells slaughterhouses.
In current year, anyone that gets the silencing word spell accusation "anti semite" thrown at them inspires me to look more closely at what they said that triggered the silencing spell. Who the messenger is strikes me as an intentional red herring distraction designed to prevent the message from being investigated and considered dispassionately.
Fwiw, Nick Fuentes has always struck me as one of the Death Cult glowies useful idiots; wttingly or unwittingly. He was definitely being hyped by glowies on /pol/ until threads hyping Nick were mocked off /pol/ although they've recently made an obviously inorganic comeback..
Pride goeth before a fall and Nick is a very pride full young man who is chronologically in his twenties and maturationally in his tweens ie easy prey.
Sadly about the only one I can think of who normally would do that sort of interviewing is Dave Rubin and he immediately jumped onto the "Ye is an antisemite" train.
Rubin? Isn't that the gay guy that bought a kid and won't talk about election crime?
Yep, he's a good interviewer but he's fallen quite a lot in my estimation for those things.
Agree with you 100%, OP.
Kanye could absolutely have elaborated, he chose to storm off.
"Storm off"???
Emotionally charged framing, why?
Drumpfs enraged and on another " Tweet Storm" versus President Trump just sent out a series of tweets. One is emotionally manipulative. The other is dispassionately descriptive. I prefer the latter and note when the former is used, especially since we are now in a life or death psywar.
Jeez man, I made a post on an internet forum it's not like I'm writing headlines for the WSJ or NYT. I get your point and even though it seems ridiculously embellished I'll double down - Kanye left the interview abruptly and rudely when he had the absolute perfect opportunity to explain his stance. I was hoping so much he would have clarified with something like:
'Obviously when I talk about "The Jews" that have done damage to my career and myself personally I'm not talking about your jewish baker down the road - I'm talking about an elite cabal of powerful people that are coordinating with one another to deplatform and demonize me. All Tony the Jew baker ever did to me was made a subpar scone. My physical fitness trainer literally tried to make me an invalid with drugs in league with others who have threatened to have my family taken away' etc.
The manner in which he left was terrible for optics. The ONLY good thing that came from the interview was both Milo and Kayne confirmed Trump was unaware who Nick even was and was not informed he would be joining the dinner'.
So far Kanye has pushed all in and is now refusing to play his cards. He rudely brought controversial people to dinner with Trump and caused a major problem for him. He isn't clarifying who 'the jews' are in this case and looks like a ridiculous antisemite that cannot defend his claims. He did in fact storm off a two hour segment before 30 minutes had even passed. He could have been chill for the main segment on YT and absolutely destroyed in the after hours segment on rumble and we would have all been better off for it. Instead he looked like an unhinged fool throwing accusations without providing the evidence to back it up. So yes, he stormed off. If you think I'm a psyop for stating the obvious that's your problem.
I don’t really understand why anyone gives a shit what he has to say. I also don’t give a shit what Milo has to say. No more than I give a shit what Kim Kardashian or Pete Davidson have to say.