Tim says “You will win the black vote”. Ye says, “But not the Jewish vote?” Tim goes, “Whoa whoa whoa, I don’t put people in groups, bigot.”
How do people refuse to acknowledge the obvious double standard here? The one group that controls the media (owns it all) that CONSTANTLY divides everyone into groups and pits them against one another, then turns around and says we can’t do EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING and acknowledge THEIR group?
To all the Jewish People who are good people, this is not sustainable. You cannot defend this. You have to allow yourself to be identified (named) and yes, even criticized as a demographic. It will not work to continue to be exempted like this, and the more you push for that, the more animosity and frustration you will generate.
If it’s okay to say “black vote” and “white privilege” and “Russian Collusion”, it’s okay to say “Jewish vote” and “Jewish privilege” and “Jewish Collusion”.
Yep, nothing is a coincidence. Great Awakening happens differently for different segments of society and it requires a lot of careful planning, a lot of useful idiots and plain old suckers.
Bright side is now the "Jews control everything" narrative is reentering peoples minds
Why are you so sure that's a bright side? The whole thing reeks of a psyop to smear everyone right of center (even milquetoasts like Tim Pool) as anti-Semitic.
"The Jews" being to blame in general has always been a psyop. The Cabal are Satan worshippers, many of which hide among Jews (and perhaps are Jews in terms of physical descent, but not spiritually). The average Jew is not a member.
"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." - Revelation 3:9
The Cabal (or at least their highest-ranking members) are cultists who follow a Satanic Babylonian mystery religion founded by Nimrod* (and are following his vision of uniting humanity under one tyrannical government). Since the Jews spent time in exile in Babylon, some of them were early converts to this religion and passed it on through the generations, which is likely one of the reasons why a high percentage of the Cabal are - or at least appear - Jewish.
But there are also Gentiles in the Cabal (the Clintons, Obama, Bill Gates, etc).
The Cabal - even the Jewish ones - have no sense of loyalty to Jews in general. Israeli citizens have been force-jabbed with the Coronavirus "vaccine" weapon more than any other country on Earth other than perhaps Australia. George Soros openly admitted that he feels no remorse for the time when, at age 14, he went door to door with his Nazi godfather, helping him haul Jews away to concentration camps and confiscate their belongings.
The Cabal have been hiding behind Jews for centuries. They appeared as Jews so that the Jews would get the blame (and the punishment) for their misdeeds. But Hitler handed the Cabal an extra advantage (possibly at their command). Where before, Jews were scapegoats for the Cabal (offering them one layer of protection and suffering pogroms and deportations for the Cabal's crimes), now they offer the Cabal two layers of protection due to the public's memory of the Holocaust and the resulting high level of stigma associated with even being suspected of anti-Semitism. Before, the Jews would get blamed for the Cabal's crimes, now it's verboten to even mention the Cabal or the idea that their crimes might be happening for fear of being branded anti-Semitic. It is in the Cabal's interest - now more than ever - to appear Jewish for this reason.
Think of it like this: an extraordinarily high percentage of convenience store robbers are black, especially when factoring their smaller numbers in the general population into the calculations. But that doesn't mean that Dr. Ben Carson is going to rob a convenience store, nor that the majority of black people will. In much the same way, a high percentage of the Cabal being (or appearing) Jewish doesn't mean that a high percentage of the total Jewish population is involved in the cabal.
Was Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Jewish by birth and religion), who fought "vaccine" agenda until his last breath, a Cabal member? Was Andrew Breitbart (Gentile by birth but a convert to Judaism)? What about Ike Perlmutter, who gave some of President Trump's biggest donations and got kicked out of his leadership role at Marvel Studios for opposing Kevin Feige and Bob Iger's plan to add leftism into the Marvel movies?
That's why the real goal should be to name the Satanists, Molech worshippers, and Nimrod-followers. Naming "The Jew" is just playing into the Cabal's plans.
From Josephus:
"Now the plain in which they first dwelt was called Shinar. God also commanded them to send colonies abroad, for the thorough peopling of the earth, that they might not raise seditions among themselves, but might cultivate a great part of the earth, and enjoy its fruits after a plentiful manner. But they were so ill instructed that they did not obey God; for which reason they fell into calamities, and were made sensible, by experience, of what sin they had been guilty: for when they flourished with a numerous youth, God admonished them again to send out colonies; but they, imagining the prosperity they enjoyed was not derived from the favor of God, but supposing that their own power was the proper cause of the plentiful condition they were in, did not obey him. Nay, they added to this their disobedience to the Divine will, the suspicion that they were therefore ordered to send out separate colonies, that, being divided asunder, they might the more easily be Oppressed.
Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers!
Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them divers languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion."
My take has been similar that it is so obvious Soros hides behinds it but was so quick to drop his ties to it to save his life as a kid. I think WW2 deserves more investigation because it quite literally has shaped the trajectory of the whole modern era. I've become increasingly more open to the idea that some of what we are told about Hitler was propoganda.
What is your take on the Holocaust, I believe millions of people died but it was more than likely the soviets killing and raping everything they found on their way to Berlin and building a cover story on the way a la the famous gas chambers seeming sketch and the larger than 9/11 levels of memorialization in the culture. Gets complicated when you consider Stalin was a Bolshevik jew targeting Jews, much simpler if it's just orders to kill anyone they want.
Hitler asked the Brits for peace 12 times after taking France and they never replied, had a pretty international military of Indian, African, and European groups, was provoked into Poland more than the narrative tells etc... The story just is super opaque still.
I'm inclined to think it happened. I've looked into the theories that it was faked in some way, and so far, the evidence has all fallen apart when I looked deeper, because it's cherry-picked and ignores other evidence. For example, the supposed discrepancies regarding how long it would take to cremate so many bodies fall apart when you read the records from concentration camps detailing their cremation process (which was drastically different from normal cremation processes and speeded up the process many times over). Similarly, the arguments that there weren't any gas chambers, that Auschwitz wasn't so bad because it had swimming pools, etc, are based on cherry-picked information and fall apart when one looks deeper (for instance, Auschwitz wasn't one camp but a collection of smaller camps, not all of which were for housing Jewish prisoners; the section for Jews was called Birkenau and there were no swimming pools located there).
Gets complicated when you consider Stalin was a Bolshevik jew targeting Jews
I'm not sure Stalin was Jewish. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (arguably the greatest historian of Soviet communism) didn't seem to think so. He wrote a book called "200 Years Together" detailing the history of Jews in Russia, including their role in the Bolshevik revolution. The book is banned in many places and hard to find, especially in its uncensored form. Here's a link to an uncensored PDF of it:
There's a popular fake Solzhenitsyn quote that often makes the rounds. It goes like this:
"You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators"
However, it has never been sourced back to anything that Solzhenitsyn is documented to have written. In chapter 15 of "200 Years Together", he criticized attempts to absolve Russians of all blame for the October Revolution and to put the blame solely on Jews. In fact, the "you must understand..." quote reads an awful lot like someone took some of his words from the portion of chapter 15 quoted below and twisted his words to mean the opposite of what he intended:
"This theme—the Jews alongside the Bolsheviks—is not new, far from it. How many pages already written on the subject! The one who wants to demonstrate that the revolution was “anything but Russian”, “foreign by nature”, invokes Jewish surnames and pseudonyms, thus claiming to exonerate the Russians from all responsibility in the revolution of seventeen. As for the Jewish authors, those who denied the Jews’ share in the revolution as well as those who have always recognised it, all agree that these Jews were not Jews by spirit, they were renegades.
We also agree on that. We must judge people for their spirit. Yes, they were renegades.
But the Russian leaders of the Bolshevik Party were also not Russians by the spirit; they were very anti‐Russian, and certainly anti‐Orthodox. With them, the great Russian culture, reduced to a doctrine and to political calculations, was distorted.
The question should be asked in another way, namely: how many scattered renegades should be brought together to form a homogeneous political current? What proportion of nationals? As far as the Russian renegades are concerned, the answer is known: alongside the Bolsheviks there were enormous numbers, an unforgivable number. But for the Jewish renegades, what was, by the enrolment and by the energy deployed, their share in the establishment of Bolshevik power?
Another question concerns the attitude of the nation towards its own renegades. However, the latter was contrasted, ranging from abomination to admiration, from mistrust to adherence. It has manifested itself in the very reactions of the popular masses, whether Russian, Jewish, or Lithuanian, in life itself much more than in the briefings of historians.
And finally: can nations deny their renegades? Is there any sense in this denial? Should a nation remember or not remember them? Can it forget the monster they have begotten? To this question the answer is no doubt: it is necessary to remember. Every people must remember its own renegades, remember them as their own—to that, there is no escape.
And then, deep down, is there an example of renegade more striking than Lenin himself? However, Lenin was Russian, there is no point in denying it. Yes, he loathed, he detested everything that had to do with ancient Russia, all Russian history and a fortiori Orthodoxy. From Russian literature he had retained only Chernyshevsky and Saltykov‐Shchedrin; Turgenev, with his liberal spirit, amused him, and Tolstoy the accuser, too. He never showed the least feeling of affection for anything, not even for the river, the Volga, on whose banks his childhood took place (and did he not instigate a lawsuit against his peasants for damage to his lands?). Moreover: it was he who pitilessly delivered the whole region to the appalling famine of 1921. Yes, all this is true. But it was we, the Russians, who created the climate in which Lenin grew up and filled him with hatred. It is in us that the Orthodox faith has lost its vigour, this faith in which he could have grown instead of declaring it a merciless war. How can one not see in him a renegade? And yet, he is Russian, and we Russians, we answer for him. His ethnic origins are sometimes invoked. Lenin was a mestizo issued from different races: his paternal grandfather, Nikolai Vasilyevich, was of Kalmyk and Chuvash blood, his grandmother, Anna Aleksievna Smirnova, was a Kalmyk, his other grandfather, Israel (Alexander of his name of baptism) Davidovitch Blank, was a Jew, his other grandmother, Anna Iohannovna (Ivanovna) Groschopf, was the daughter of a German and a Swede, Anna Beata Estedt. But that does not change the case. For nothing of this makes it possible to exclude him from the Russian people: we must recognise in him a Russian phenomenon on the one hand, for all the ethnic groups which gave him birth have been implicated in the history of the Russian Empire, and, on the other hand, a Russian phenomenon, the fruit of the country we have built, we Russians, and its social climate—even if he appears to us, because of his spirit always indifferent to Russia, or even completely anti‐Russian, as a phenomenon completely foreign to us. We cannot, in spite of everything, disown him.
What about the Jewish renegades? As we have seen, during the year 1917, there was no particular attraction for the Bolsheviks that manifested among the Jews. But their activism has played its part in the revolutionary upheavals. At the last Congress of the Russian Social‐Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) (London, 1907), which was, it is true, common with the Mensheviks, of 302‒305 delegates, 160 were Jews, more than half—it was promising. Then, after the April 1917 Conference, just after the announcement of the explosive April Theses of Lenin, among the nine members of the new Central Committee were G. Zinoviev, L. Kamenev, Ia. Sverdlov. At the VIth summer Congress of the RKP (b) (the Russian Communist Party of the Bolsheviks, the new name of the RSDLP), eleven members were elected to the Central Committee, including Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Trotsky, Uritsky.[1781] Then, at the “historic meeting” in Karpovka Street, in the apartment of Himmer and Flaksermann, on 10 October 1917, when the decision to launch the Bolshevik coup was taken, among the twelve participants were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sverdlov, Uritsky, Sokolnikov. It was there that was elected the first “Politburo” which was to have such a brilliant future, and among its seven members, always the same: Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sokolnikov. Which is already a lot. D. S. Pasmanik clearly states: “There is no doubt that the Jewish renegades outnumbered the normal percentage…; they occupied too great a place among the Bolshevik commissioners.”
Of course, all this was happening in the governing spheres of Bolshevism and in no way foreshadowed a mass movement of Jews. Moreover, the Jewish members of the Politburo did not act as a constituted group. Thus Kamenev and Zinoviev were against a hasty coup. The only master of the work, the genius of October’s coup de force, was in fact Trotsky: he did not exaggerate his role in his Lessons of October. This cowardly Lenin, who, he, had been hiding out, made no substantial contribution to the putsch.
Basically, because of his internationalism and following his dispute with the Bund in 1903, Lenin adhered to the opinion that there was not and never would be such a thing as a “Jewish nationality”; that this was a reactionary action which disunited the revolutionary forces. (In agreement with him, Stalin held the Jews for a “paper nation”, and considered their assimilation inevitable.) Lenin therefore saw anti‐Semitism as a manœuvre of capitalism, an easy weapon in the hands of counter‐revolution, something that was not natural. He understood very well, however, what mobilising force the Jewish question represented in the ideological struggle in general. And to exploit, for the good of the revolution, the feeling of bitterness particularly prevalent among the Jews, Lenin was always ready to do so."
In chapter 14, he wrote this:
"The closer it got to to October coup and the more apparent the Bolshevik threat, the wider this realization spread among Jews, leading them to oppose Bolshevism. It was taking root even among socialist parties and during the October coup many Jewish socialists were actively against it. Yet they were debilitated by their socialist views and their opposition was limited by negotiations and newspaper articles – until the Bolsheviks shut down those newspapers.
It is necessary to state explicitly that the October coup was not carried by Jews (though it was under the general command of Trotsky and with energetic actions of young Grigory Chudnovsky during the arrest of Provisional Government and the massacre of the defenders of the Winter Palace). Broadly speaking, the common rebuke, that the 170-million-people could not be pushed into Bolshevism by a small Jewish minority, is justified. Indeed, we had ourselves sealed our fate in 1917, through our foolishness from February to October-December.
The October coup proved a devastating lot for Russia. Yet the state of affairs even before it promised little good to the people. We had already lost responsible statesmanship and the events of 1917 had proved it in excess. The best Russia could expect was an inept, feeble, and disorderly pseudo-democracy, unable to rely on enough citizens with developed legal consciousness and economic independence.
After October fights in Moscow, representatives of the Bund and Poale-Zion had taken part in the peace negotiations – not in alliance with the Junkers or the Bolsheviks — but as a third independent party. There were many Jews among Junkers of the Engineers School who defended the Winter Palace on October 25: in the memoirs of Sinegub, a palace defender, Jewish names appear regularly; I personally knew one such engineer from my prison experience. And during the Odessa City Duma elections the Jewish block had opposed the Bolsheviks and won, though only marginally."
The book is very thorough and nuanced, neither downplaying nor exaggerating the role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution. Solzhenitsyn carefully addressed every aspect and angle.
Tim says “You will win the black vote”. Ye says, “But not the Jewish vote?” Tim goes, “Whoa whoa whoa, I don’t put people in groups, bigot.”
How do people refuse to acknowledge the obvious double standard here? The one group that controls the media (owns it all) that CONSTANTLY divides everyone into groups and pits them against one another, then turns around and says we can’t do EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING and acknowledge THEIR group?
To all the Jewish People who are good people, this is not sustainable. You cannot defend this. You have to allow yourself to be identified (named) and yes, even criticized as a demographic. It will not work to continue to be exempted like this, and the more you push for that, the more animosity and frustration you will generate.
If it’s okay to say “black vote” and “white privilege” and “Russian Collusion”, it’s okay to say “Jewish vote” and “Jewish privilege” and “Jewish Collusion”.
Yep, nothing is a coincidence. Great Awakening happens differently for different segments of society and it requires a lot of careful planning, a lot of useful idiots and plain old suckers.
Why are you so sure that's a bright side? The whole thing reeks of a psyop to smear everyone right of center (even milquetoasts like Tim Pool) as anti-Semitic.
"The Jews" being to blame in general has always been a psyop. The Cabal are Satan worshippers, many of which hide among Jews (and perhaps are Jews in terms of physical descent, but not spiritually). The average Jew is not a member.
The Cabal (or at least their highest-ranking members) are cultists who follow a Satanic Babylonian mystery religion founded by Nimrod* (and are following his vision of uniting humanity under one tyrannical government). Since the Jews spent time in exile in Babylon, some of them were early converts to this religion and passed it on through the generations, which is likely one of the reasons why a high percentage of the Cabal are - or at least appear - Jewish.
But there are also Gentiles in the Cabal (the Clintons, Obama, Bill Gates, etc).
The Cabal - even the Jewish ones - have no sense of loyalty to Jews in general. Israeli citizens have been force-jabbed with the Coronavirus "vaccine" weapon more than any other country on Earth other than perhaps Australia. George Soros openly admitted that he feels no remorse for the time when, at age 14, he went door to door with his Nazi godfather, helping him haul Jews away to concentration camps and confiscate their belongings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiqHiQYuoOs
The Cabal have been hiding behind Jews for centuries. They appeared as Jews so that the Jews would get the blame (and the punishment) for their misdeeds. But Hitler handed the Cabal an extra advantage (possibly at their command). Where before, Jews were scapegoats for the Cabal (offering them one layer of protection and suffering pogroms and deportations for the Cabal's crimes), now they offer the Cabal two layers of protection due to the public's memory of the Holocaust and the resulting high level of stigma associated with even being suspected of anti-Semitism. Before, the Jews would get blamed for the Cabal's crimes, now it's verboten to even mention the Cabal or the idea that their crimes might be happening for fear of being branded anti-Semitic. It is in the Cabal's interest - now more than ever - to appear Jewish for this reason.
Think of it like this: an extraordinarily high percentage of convenience store robbers are black, especially when factoring their smaller numbers in the general population into the calculations. But that doesn't mean that Dr. Ben Carson is going to rob a convenience store, nor that the majority of black people will. In much the same way, a high percentage of the Cabal being (or appearing) Jewish doesn't mean that a high percentage of the total Jewish population is involved in the cabal.
Was Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Jewish by birth and religion), who fought "vaccine" agenda until his last breath, a Cabal member? Was Andrew Breitbart (Gentile by birth but a convert to Judaism)? What about Ike Perlmutter, who gave some of President Trump's biggest donations and got kicked out of his leadership role at Marvel Studios for opposing Kevin Feige and Bob Iger's plan to add leftism into the Marvel movies?
That's why the real goal should be to name the Satanists, Molech worshippers, and Nimrod-followers. Naming "The Jew" is just playing into the Cabal's plans.
My take has been similar that it is so obvious Soros hides behinds it but was so quick to drop his ties to it to save his life as a kid. I think WW2 deserves more investigation because it quite literally has shaped the trajectory of the whole modern era. I've become increasingly more open to the idea that some of what we are told about Hitler was propoganda.
What is your take on the Holocaust, I believe millions of people died but it was more than likely the soviets killing and raping everything they found on their way to Berlin and building a cover story on the way a la the famous gas chambers seeming sketch and the larger than 9/11 levels of memorialization in the culture. Gets complicated when you consider Stalin was a Bolshevik jew targeting Jews, much simpler if it's just orders to kill anyone they want.
Hitler asked the Brits for peace 12 times after taking France and they never replied, had a pretty international military of Indian, African, and European groups, was provoked into Poland more than the narrative tells etc... The story just is super opaque still.
I'm inclined to think it happened. I've looked into the theories that it was faked in some way, and so far, the evidence has all fallen apart when I looked deeper, because it's cherry-picked and ignores other evidence. For example, the supposed discrepancies regarding how long it would take to cremate so many bodies fall apart when you read the records from concentration camps detailing their cremation process (which was drastically different from normal cremation processes and speeded up the process many times over). Similarly, the arguments that there weren't any gas chambers, that Auschwitz wasn't so bad because it had swimming pools, etc, are based on cherry-picked information and fall apart when one looks deeper (for instance, Auschwitz wasn't one camp but a collection of smaller camps, not all of which were for housing Jewish prisoners; the section for Jews was called Birkenau and there were no swimming pools located there).
I'm not sure Stalin was Jewish. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (arguably the greatest historian of Soviet communism) didn't seem to think so. He wrote a book called "200 Years Together" detailing the history of Jews in Russia, including their role in the Bolshevik revolution. The book is banned in many places and hard to find, especially in its uncensored form. Here's a link to an uncensored PDF of it:
https://web.archive.org/web/20221129195455if_/https://fs12n1.sendspace.com/dl/630c95ca41b11b90630229444756d027/6386634f30e8f7e0/10xc7v/Two Hundred Years Together - Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn.pdf
There's a popular fake Solzhenitsyn quote that often makes the rounds. It goes like this:
However, it has never been sourced back to anything that Solzhenitsyn is documented to have written. In chapter 15 of "200 Years Together", he criticized attempts to absolve Russians of all blame for the October Revolution and to put the blame solely on Jews. In fact, the "you must understand..." quote reads an awful lot like someone took some of his words from the portion of chapter 15 quoted below and twisted his words to mean the opposite of what he intended:
In chapter 14, he wrote this:
The book is very thorough and nuanced, neither downplaying nor exaggerating the role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution. Solzhenitsyn carefully addressed every aspect and angle.
This should be a stickied post of its own, great info to keep us on target
What happens if Israeli media endorses Trump again?
My guess is that they endorsed him because he's very effective at reducing Islamic terrorism.
That wasn't the question.
I'm not sure what you meant by the question. I'm not sure what (if any) effect that Israeli media endorsing him again would have on anything.