Possibilities:
Why would Secret Service allow an unarmored car to transport a sitting president?
False Flag to scare the public?
Comms for those in the know?
He outlasted his usefulness?
Biden isn't president & has no privilege to armored government vehicles?
This makes no sense. Not sure what this is but since when does a sitting president travel in rented vehicles? Makes one wonder, who is POTUS? Feels kinda like that time that the so called Pres and VP flew on AF1 together... the things that make you go hmmmmm.
Not just one rental, but five rentals caught fire?! At an airport, after they had been returned from being used? Nah, that’s suspicious as all get out. There was some kind of evidence that needed to get torched.
I learned about this on a Sky King General thread on 4chan. Someone posted a screenshot of the story after someone was posting snaps of drones flying over Nantucket
Not sure. Not sure how you’d find that out, either.
The only SS travel news I’ve seen was when the head counsel/the SS got outed for following Clinton 2016 advice on purchasing airline tickets outside of the normal guidelines and they were found to have overpaid $4 million because of it.
I haven’t been able to find anything else either, so this is either a big nothingburger (normal way of handling rental cars, and an unlucky fire that will sooner or later statistically happen if SS rents thousands of cars every year), or huuuge news.
all 5 cars diff makes and models all up in flames....this smells really bad......
Possibilities: Why would Secret Service allow an unarmored car to transport a sitting president?
False Flag to scare the public? Comms for those in the know? He outlasted his usefulness? Biden isn't president & has no privilege to armored government vehicles?
What else am I missing as a potential?
They needed to destroy some evidence. This was planned, which is why they used rented vehicles. The real SS vehicles are very very expensive.
Someone forgot their laptop?
Good catch.
This makes no sense. Not sure what this is but since when does a sitting president travel in rented vehicles? Makes one wonder, who is POTUS? Feels kinda like that time that the so called Pres and VP flew on AF1 together... the things that make you go hmmmmm.
Not just one rental, but five rentals caught fire?! At an airport, after they had been returned from being used? Nah, that’s suspicious as all get out. There was some kind of evidence that needed to get torched.
Agree this is very suspicious.
But do we know that renting cars for certain SS staff isn’t modus operandi?
Cars burns all the time (mostly 12V failure), and if 5 cars a parked together, it’s enough that one catches fire for the rest to burn.
I know I’m playing devil’s advocate, I’m just trying to see if there might be a non nefarious explanation.
I learned about this on a Sky King General thread on 4chan. Someone posted a screenshot of the story after someone was posting snaps of drones flying over Nantucket
I’m not arguing the story that the SS rented 5 cars, and the burned later at the airport.
My question is, how normal is it for the SS to use rental cars?
Cates argued that the real SS wouldn’t use rental cars, and that the real SS cars would be used somewhere else for the real POTUS.
I really like that explanation, but for that to be true, rental cars for the SS would be something new (<2 years).
Do we know that to be true?
Not sure. Not sure how you’d find that out, either.
The only SS travel news I’ve seen was when the head counsel/the SS got outed for following Clinton 2016 advice on purchasing airline tickets outside of the normal guidelines and they were found to have overpaid $4 million because of it.
I haven’t been able to find anything else either, so this is either a big nothingburger (normal way of handling rental cars, and an unlucky fire that will sooner or later statistically happen if SS rents thousands of cars every year), or huuuge news.
I don’t know yet what to think.