Interesting thought about the Balenciaga photos.
Was talking with a based friend today. He has around 30 years experience in corporate, marketing and stuff.
He explained: There is NO WAY that the Balenciaga photos was a slip-up. They were planted. There is NO WAY that this sort of imagery would make it through corporate upper levels. It's inherently a self-destruct button. And the semi-hidden piece of legislation around Child porn?
His thought is that there are white hats behind the scenes, with a gun (metaphorically) to the head of those running the company, and they instructed "now publish it".
Why? To wake the normies up. To wake them up to the underbelly of pedocriminality behind Hollywood, the celeb world, the luxury items and (wanna be) elites.
I know that in the world of Luciferian evil, they post stuff out on the open. Hiding in plain sight. They seed narratives and induce trance, etc.
That was my take on it, initially. But his explanation felt very convincing, and I'm open to that as a possible explanation.
If indeed we are watching the show, then who orchestrates the show? It's the white hats.
In any case, I thought it was an interesting take, and really makes a LOT of sense if you know and understand the corporate world and marketing. I have to at least admit that it's possible.
In other words, when the time was right, someone gave the direction "Now, publish that content!" in order to add info in the info war to essentially frame Balenciaga and wake up the normies.
Hmmmm...
So my question is about this step in the theory:
How is this accomplished legally? Who is putting the metaphorical gun with legal protections against criminal duress and/or blackmail? Why wouldn't the corporate entities or whoever just blow the whistle on being "forced" with this?
Sealed indictment. The white hats have turned the deep state tricks upon them. “if you do not do this, these are the charges you face. Do what we ask, and this lesser set of charges is what you will face.”
Good question. I didn't get that far.
Maybe one possibility is:
"Patriots in trusted positions".
Infiltration of the infiltrators. Control of the very top or key people, not the whole collective.
Also, if the corp entities are compromised, could they blow the whistle without exposing and indicting themselves?
I didn't ask my friend, but its a really good question.