Well, the EUA grants immunity from liability to the manufacturer, but not to politicians or private businesses.
I have been expecting this sort of legal defense, however. "We never forced anyone", which would be medical coercion. It was "informed consent" that people decided on their own to take an experimental gene therapy thinking it was a safe, approved vaccine.
However, fraud vitiates everything... plus the companies that coerced employees with mandates will try to blame the government for their actions. Quite a mess.
Edit: also I and others are mixing up rules in the US vs. the legal system in India. The EUA etc. applies to the US. I don't know the situation in India, which was the topic of the post.
Well, the EUA grants immunity from liability to the manufacturer, but not to politicians or private businesses.
I have been expecting this sort of legal defense, however. "We never forced anyone", which would be medical coercion. It was "informed consent" that people decided on their own to take an experimental gene therapy thinking it was a safe, approved vaccine.
However, fraud vitiates everything... plus the companies that coerced employees with mandates will try to blame the government for their actions. Quite a mess.
Edit: also I and others are mixing up rules in the US vs. the legal system in India. The EUA etc. applies to the US. I don't know the situation in India, which was the topic of the post.
That is where the emergency powers come into play.