If I say the Crips and the Bloods is a black problem, I’m not being a collectivist. If I say the Hollywood studios is a Jewish problem, I’m not being a collectivist. I know that for some bizarre reason everyone feels that saying “Jewish” ever, about anything, is equivalent to HATE (I feel that programming too) but that is the whole problem. There is an unfair advantage in what is clearly an identitarian world if one identity cannot be identified, because it allows a masked or shadow tribal influence in business and culture. Also, turning identitarianism back around on Jewish People might be the one and only way to actually get it to stop in the media. Not that Jewish People have any control of media whatsoever but we might coincidentally learn that once identity politics backfires against Jewish interests it will organically and naturally disappear from media and be replaced once again with the melting pot paradigm.
Why is this not a good argument in your eyes to not be collectivist?
Is it that the “good Jew” really isn’t? Or is it another reason?
If I say the Crips and the Bloods is a black problem, I’m not being a collectivist. If I say the Hollywood studios is a Jewish problem, I’m not being a collectivist. I know that for some bizarre reason everyone feels that saying “Jewish” ever, about anything, is equivalent to HATE (I feel that programming too) but that is the whole problem. There is an unfair advantage in what is clearly an identitarian world if one identity cannot be identified, because it allows a masked or shadow tribal influence in business and culture. Also, turning identitarianism back around on Jewish People might be the one and only way to actually get it to stop in the media. Not that Jewish People have any control of media whatsoever but we might coincidentally learn that once identity politics backfires against Jewish interests it will organically and naturally disappear from media and be replaced once again with the melting pot paradigm.