I didn’t say all Q posts, I said some. The only “cop out” is you trying to reframe what I said and argue a point I didn’t make.
Your evidence is Q posts, as you said. But Q said that some posts were not true. If you believe all Q posts, you have to accept that what you currently believe could be disinfo by Q. Therefore, the statement “AJ is Mossad” could be disinfo.
That’s a cop out, and I think you know it.
Why are we’re here if every Q post is suspect?
I didn’t say all Q posts, I said some. The only “cop out” is you trying to reframe what I said and argue a point I didn’t make.
Your evidence is Q posts, as you said. But Q said that some posts were not true. If you believe all Q posts, you have to accept that what you currently believe could be disinfo by Q. Therefore, the statement “AJ is Mossad” could be disinfo.
Your comment is actually the cop out on not acknowledging Q's statement that disinfo is necessary.