Trust their Science ? Former Global Head Of Trust And Safety At Twitter Reveals Widespead Scientific Censorship
(www.zerohedge.com)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
Comments (14)
sorted by:
The trust and safety elites within Big Tech companies have no doubts about the validity and righteousness of their cause, and that's the biggest problem. The monstrous nature of the ideology of scientifically precise censorship is on full display in the following interview with Roth at the Knight Foundation. Roth has no qualms about the notion of crushing free speech. (video at the link)
They have been caught. They all enabled Genocide. Roth should hang.
Of course he doesn't.
He's a ROTH after all. Hint hint.
YOU cannot argue with idiots. STOP watching, STOP buying their shit and most of all SOP listening to their BS propaganda. WINNING
The right thing at the right time would have saved all of us from all of this.
What did 'we' say when a Science Board was created and was supposed to report THROUGH the government in order to control it.
With an out of control government who can tell the difference between control and out of control science? And wtf is controlled science? Oh yeah, forgot.....the 'Scientific Method' used to 'control' science and that's out the window now.
Weather for this week, widening drips followed by coalescing outrage on a new front.Next week, possible floods.
Anyone else super curious about the ironies here?
Trust And Safety might be the name of the department, but in reality, their actions have destroyed both concepts in the big tech space.
They are absolutely and now obviously untrustworthy. And safety? What is this? What do all the fucking millenials and zoomers have to carry this idea around like it's their shadow?? Safe from what?
This is a classic cabal/satanic trick.
The title is the exact opposite of the intent/goal.
Like antifa. Or feminism. Or this.
Every time.
a) "the science" represents a copyright protected racket.
b) suggested scientism tempts one to ignore perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
Nature communicates itself from whole (perceivable) to each partial (perceiving)...all suggestions tempt one to ignore that.
c) trust represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable balance (action) to perceiving choice (reaction) natural law.
Nature doesn't require trust; it demands adaptation.
Ah Ha you are returned with your personal Narcissistic Nazi Grammar BOT,
do you ever make a comment in a natural format from your own mind?
Reality can only be utilized...not possessed by those within. Try holding onto your life and see how that will turn out...
a) PER (by) SONOS (sound)...how could it be my sound, if it implies being by sound?
b) what if the momentum of sound represents the balance (resonance/dissonance) for ones free will of choice?
a) MAKE, verb - "to cause to exist in a different form"...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one can only remake aka RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by).
b) suggested EV'ER, adverb - "at all times" tempts one to ignore the perceivable ever changing moment (um), which implies one to be "momentarily" (living) within ever (process of dying).
Ones mind represents the natural formed expression (growth) of everything impressing (loss).
FRINGE (Latin frango, to break) + DWELL (to inhabit for a time)...so what are ya taking a break from?
You need to update your software.
https://www.guidedmind.com/blog/9-signs-that-you-are-a-fringe-dweller