I have no idea how that even makes sense. The lawsuits I'm aware of were all about states violating their own laws (e.g. the big one with no standing IIRC because the other states weren't really harmed - yeah right - or whatever) and stuff like that. I never heard anything about "ideology/party politics" in any of them.
Thanks for your reply. As I said this was something I heard on a local radio talk show. I thought it made sense--I saw that you put disenfranchised voters in your headline, but I didn't think the lawsuits from Trump's 2020 were on the disenfranchised voter, and were on a protected class suit, which the talk show hosts (2 man show, morning) said that political, I used, ideology was not a protected class in the constitution. The were saying just because a party doesn't agree with you is not a reason to rule an election is fraud. I don't know if I cleared up what I was thinking or not, but I hope you get the point I tried to make. I am glad you responded to let me know the lawsuits were on states violating their own laws and not anything else. I agree the whole country was harmed. But for the Supreme Court to rule the president didn't have "standing" is, to me, totally ridiculous.
I have no idea how that even makes sense. The lawsuits I'm aware of were all about states violating their own laws (e.g. the big one with no standing IIRC because the other states weren't really harmed - yeah right - or whatever) and stuff like that. I never heard anything about "ideology/party politics" in any of them.
Thanks for your reply. As I said this was something I heard on a local radio talk show. I thought it made sense--I saw that you put disenfranchised voters in your headline, but I didn't think the lawsuits from Trump's 2020 were on the disenfranchised voter, and were on a protected class suit, which the talk show hosts (2 man show, morning) said that political, I used, ideology was not a protected class in the constitution. The were saying just because a party doesn't agree with you is not a reason to rule an election is fraud. I don't know if I cleared up what I was thinking or not, but I hope you get the point I tried to make. I am glad you responded to let me know the lawsuits were on states violating their own laws and not anything else. I agree the whole country was harmed. But for the Supreme Court to rule the president didn't have "standing" is, to me, totally ridiculous.
Quick note - I'm not the OP :)