Devolution Proof: "Why would the Biden admin send weapons that can’t be used against the 'enemy' "
(media.greatawakening.win)
DEVOLUTION
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
Sometimes to bring your people to your “needed call” you must let them experience exactly what can happen, therefore being able to state, “Defend or it’ll get worse.” Trump did the same thing. Sometimes you can’t just tell people. You must show them.”
This seems incredibly specious and like some serious motivated reasoning
More likely is Russia simply can’t properly defend every airbase in its vast territory
If we had reliable damage numbers, it would be possible to assess the claim. But all we get is western propaganda sources. It is also difficult to believe Russia on most things too.
Hypothetically speaking, what I am saying is this: if we knew how much damage was caused, and how many casualties, it would be possible to tell if this was the kind of attack that you’d let happen vs the kind of attack you got caught with pants down. Trivial damage, little to no casualties = probably allowed to happen. Serious damage/many casualties = probably caught by surprise.
Also, if he just let this happen, we wouldn’t have reported on it. Because we’d know if we snuck in or they let us in. And we wouldn’t give him the benefit of acknowledging what happened.
FiGhT tHeM tHeRe oR FiGhT tHeM hErE
Remember that?