That would have to be you. I read both citations. The first one was about power scavenging from extraneous signals. The second one was a catalog of images and products. I worked with phased array antenna technology that can point the beam up to 60 degrees off-axis. Old hat 30 years ago.
Next time, if you want to correct someone "who can't read," be so kind as to fill in the blanks so what you say is worth reading.
The tells just keep on coming. You make a post with cryptic links that do not support your point. When this is pointed out, you accuse the critic of being illiterate. When you are refuted, you totally duck the criticism and go on the personal offensive. When there is no argument, resort to ad hominem. Like clockwork. The peanut gallery is watching...
Brother you are something else. You admittedly call yourself the "DeathRayDesigner" ... so okay, yours is bigger than mine. What I posted is valid, sorry it doesn't blow you away, it wasn't designed to do that. DeathRays are not us.
Who cares what I call myself? It's what I did for a living, unless you think a megawatt-class laser is not a death ray. You have some problem with accuracy? I also worked on phased-array communication systems with beam pointing.
What you posted does not support your claim. If you want to walk through your reference to show that it does, that would have been far more conducive to communication, and would show that you know something. But you are far from that now. You are well into the mano-a-mano confrontation mode. There's no point. This part of the thread is now below water.
That would have to be you. I read both citations. The first one was about power scavenging from extraneous signals. The second one was a catalog of images and products. I worked with phased array antenna technology that can point the beam up to 60 degrees off-axis. Old hat 30 years ago.
Next time, if you want to correct someone "who can't read," be so kind as to fill in the blanks so what you say is worth reading.
No sir, that would be you with an agenda.
The tells just keep on coming. You make a post with cryptic links that do not support your point. When this is pointed out, you accuse the critic of being illiterate. When you are refuted, you totally duck the criticism and go on the personal offensive. When there is no argument, resort to ad hominem. Like clockwork. The peanut gallery is watching...
Brother you are something else. You admittedly call yourself the "DeathRayDesigner" ... so okay, yours is bigger than mine. What I posted is valid, sorry it doesn't blow you away, it wasn't designed to do that. DeathRays are not us.
Who cares what I call myself? It's what I did for a living, unless you think a megawatt-class laser is not a death ray. You have some problem with accuracy? I also worked on phased-array communication systems with beam pointing.
What you posted does not support your claim. If you want to walk through your reference to show that it does, that would have been far more conducive to communication, and would show that you know something. But you are far from that now. You are well into the mano-a-mano confrontation mode. There's no point. This part of the thread is now below water.