I've always been on the fence about Elon, especially about neural link, But to me there's no denying that the cleanup of a Twitter is absolutely in line with the Q plan. The timing of everything, especially with Kari Lake fighting the Arizona election, I feel like the storm has been brewing and starting to rain.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Consider the assets that Elon now has under his wing.
Not only does Elon own Twitter, he also has control over the greatest communications infrastructure the world has ever seen with his Star Link network.
Elon is undoubtedly working with, or directly for the Military and the Q team. Space Force and Star Link are both integral components to the disclosure phase of The Great Awakening. Without Star Link, a communications blackout could set the Q plan back decades. Elon's moves both terrestrial, and extraterrestrial, have significantly shortened the timeline of the final Check Mate move against the Cabal.
Many Anons get hung up on Elon's past dealings with the Black Hats, Deep Staters, and Cabalists. Never forget that even President Trump at one point was cordial with these people until he discovered their true nature and distanced himself from them.
Consider also the use of tactical cloaking in a Fifth Generation War. Programs like Star Link could have never gotten off the ground had the Deep Staters and Cabalists been aware of Elon's true intentions. Thus, disguising ones self as a Black Hat, and outwardly aligning with their principals may have been the only way for Elon to rise through the ranks of society to his position of power we see him in now.
Do not forget that the National Security Agency was likewise constructed under the guise of spying on Americans and compiling a database of all human interactions. The Deep State thought they had it made until they realized that the NSA was being turned against them. In retaliation, they sent Edward Snowden into the NSA as a plant to discredit the organization and tarnish its reputation in the public eye, and distract from its true purpose.
Many Anons are still hung up on emotional reactions when they should be thinking logically and critically about the moves and counter moves that are being made on the board.
You don't have to like Elon, or even agree with him to acknowledge that what he is doing with Twitter and Star Link are undoubtedly a part of the Q plan.
I am a fan of the deep cover / disguising oneself as a Black Hat theory.
I would draw into consideration the idea of stalking. When you are stalking a beast, hunting down the pray, you camouflage. What if the hunt takes decades?
To play the long game, there would definitely be a need for some to play like moles, and give appearances. Heck, consider the Cold war. In the 80s, I met with and talked with an undercover operative in Seoul, Korea. He was operating in Moscow, and was in Korea for "a conference" that I was interpreting at.
His confession of the difficulties he faced being under virtual 24 hour surveillance by the KGB was gut wrenching. He had to pretend to be someone he most certainly was not.
When undercover, deep behind enemy lines, you MUST play a role, and present a specific persona or image that allows you to navigate, not be ejected.
"Programs like Star Link could have never gotten off the ground had the Deep Staters and Cabalists been aware of Elon's true intentions."
At this juncture, I cannot shake the feeling that Musky is working in close cooperation with the Don. Too much data pointing in this direction to be ignored.
I hope some time soon to do a serious dig and write up on this. The key point is: let's remember that POTUS has been also playing a role. You NEED someone who can stand up the front and be the figurehead, even while being Q+ in the background.
So, yes take into account Musks history, surroundings, choices, etc. But also apply the powerful paradigms that Q highlights, to not simply react to what stuff looks like on the surface.
For Pete's sake: Q chose the CHANS to post and work. How many zillions of people discredited Q because of where they were posting???/ (A lot.)
Could even explain the baphomet thing he's wearing in his Twitter profile pic. It was a Halloween costume. As in he was disguising himself as one of them (and has been for years).
I'm still close to 50-50 on Musk but I'm just throwing that out there.
Recent Musk posts : i.e. "My Pronouns are PROSECUTE/FAUCI" leave almost no doubt now that He is being a complete wrecking ball on the Deep State narrative.
https://t.me/riseofthenewmedia/454
Some nuffnuff replied to Musk saying please don't belittle mock marginalized an at-risk-of-violence members of the LGBTQA community. Musks response?
"Forcing your pronouns upon others when they didn't ask and implicitly ostracizing those who don't is neither neither good nor kind to anyone."
Like trump..he does a lot of trolling
This is so true. Everything you said makes logical sense. I have read the same things.
Damn your post is more interesting than my whole post 😂
That Qanaut tends to do that...
Of course, you set the stage, fren. IMO, a lot of our best content emerges because of anons bouncing off anons.
You do know Starlink only has around 500,000 subscribers, right? And that they rely on fiber connected ground stations to communicate with the broader Internet, right? And that only the satellites launched since September 2021 have lasers on them? In other words, Starlink can be decapitated as a mass information platform relatively easily.
Terrestrial radio is a far less expensive way to reach far more people.