PS. The case has been docketed and will be distributed for conference on Jan 6. This means, that on Jan 6 the court will discuss in private whether the case merits going forward to a hearing, or whether the court will simply decline to hear it.

If they ACCEPT to hear it, that would be a big deal. But that is a HUGE if.

November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will officially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)

From the Brunson's own website.

About SC distributing cases for conference:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.aspx

The actual court docket:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

But if the SC was not going to accept it, why did they push it? They are treating this case like no other.

Um, this is ambiguous. Who is "they" here?

Cases can be docketed with the SC which means they are on a list for the SC to look at and decide whether or not they will hear the case. As far as I know, there has been no decision on that point yet, but maybe I'm wrong. The point, however, is that getting on the docket does not mean that the SC will hear the case. It's just a first step necessary for them to consider whether or not they will hear it.

The SC did not "push" this case in any way, did they? Or are you saying they delayed making a determination on whether they will hear it or not?

Either way, I am simply offering a response to why perhaps the frens on the board are not making as big a deal of this as you seem to think is warranted.