Ahh. So in answering my question, one might honestly reply that there is no example and you are referring to "a history... ” . Got it. Thank you for clearing that up. Carry on.
It is clear. The info needed is not on the page. It is elsewhere. One has to know the "history of ” . And that is not in that thread. Which is what I was inquiring toward. I wasn't sure I had the relevant info. I was correct. This is no affront to you although it may seem like it. Carry on.
"But the language used in the OP first sentence is sooo slimy and manipulative. Yuk. Not necessary. Anons are first and foremost repulsed by coercion. Share info. Do not spin. Handle info with care and do not taint it with bias of any kind, in an effort to manage Truth honestly. And to set an example of how a man conducts himself with integrity. Don't be slimy. Carry on"
You typed this. Why? If you don't like the post then just move on.
Oh! Well, I'm here to do the thing. The 1A. thing. The spirit of that. Also I have a stake in the movement, just as you do. And when I see an attitude that I think is weak ass, then ima call it out. Alright. Right on, Anon. See you out there, let's keep it real!
" Only a man walking with Jesus Christ could do such a thing. Obviously Jesus and his Father do it every day instead of just "fixing" it. GEOTUS, God, and Jesus will WIN for the Anons,"
Curious which post here reads as dooming. Genuinely curious because I didn't catch it.
It's a simple metric, if there's a history of whining and mocking, that's a good start.
Ahh. So in answering my question, one might honestly reply that there is no example and you are referring to "a history... ” . Got it. Thank you for clearing that up. Carry on.
No, read again.
"It's a simple metric, if there's a history of whining and mocking, that's a good start."
Is that not clear?
Yea mate. I got it the first time. Totally clear.
It is clear. The info needed is not on the page. It is elsewhere. One has to know the "history of ” . And that is not in that thread. Which is what I was inquiring toward. I wasn't sure I had the relevant info. I was correct. This is no affront to you although it may seem like it. Carry on.
"But the language used in the OP first sentence is sooo slimy and manipulative. Yuk. Not necessary. Anons are first and foremost repulsed by coercion. Share info. Do not spin. Handle info with care and do not taint it with bias of any kind, in an effort to manage Truth honestly. And to set an example of how a man conducts himself with integrity. Don't be slimy. Carry on"
You typed this. Why? If you don't like the post then just move on.
Oh! Well, I'm here to do the thing. The 1A. thing. The spirit of that. Also I have a stake in the movement, just as you do. And when I see an attitude that I think is weak ass, then ima call it out. Alright. Right on, Anon. See you out there, let's keep it real!
" Only a man walking with Jesus Christ could do such a thing. Obviously Jesus and his Father do it every day instead of just "fixing" it. GEOTUS, God, and Jesus will WIN for the Anons,"
Weird thing to type. Why?
These are statements that reflect my belief system.