Well, first of all, the reference to "Nazi" is a term that was never used by Germans themselves. It was an insult coined by Konrad Heiden, a Jewish propagandist. If you want to start with propaganda, that's as good a place as any.
Much of what is discussed today about the Third Reich, is what is known as "bad propaganda." There was actually "good propaganda" in use during that time as well, most famously by Josef Goebbels. There were so many lies during that time being circulated by the bolshevik communists describing the evils of Germany, that it was having an effect on the German populace. Goebbels was instrumental in creating "good propaganda" to remind the German people of their heritage, and their accomplishments, and to ignore the lies being said about them.
I really don't know what you mean when you say, "social control," as that could mean any one of several things. I can say, however, that the reconstruction of Germany following the Weimar Republic was nothing short of miraculous, and the Germans recognized and appreciated all that was done for them to bring them out of the ashes. They enjoyed more freedoms following Weimar, and enjoyed more wealth and success than ever before. The stability of their currency was vitally important.
It's important to note that during this same time frame, the rest of the world was still struggling to overcome the after-effects of the Great Depression.
bad propaganda? GTFO Nazi killed 6 million Jews and 298,000 Americans died because of Nazis. That is not bad propaganda. That is a bad people. The rest of what you commented is just gobbly gook.
If you really spent the time to understand what happened in WWI, The Treaty of Versailles, The Weimar Republic, and WWII, you would know that what you just wrote is more propaganda. The very best records indicate that perhaps 250,000 to 275,000 Jews died in the camps, mostly as the result of typhus. Why would there be hospitals and doctors if the agenda were to execute?
David Irving ( one of the best historians alive today) started out disbelieving the "death camp" story. I think this definately applies to Auschwitz- proof of gas chambers there is more full of holes than Obama's birth certificate. However, Mr Irving recounts in a later talk the story of Operation Reinhardt- this operation was an extermination of primarily Jews in order to confiscate their assets, carried out at the camps of Sobibor, Belzec and Treblinka. Their is proof of the killing of 1.5 million, and hints at more than that. These camps where burnt to the ground and then planted over to camoflage them after the operation was complete, at Himmlers order.
In order to historically analyze the story about "Operation Reinhard," one must understand a bit about the methods behind the dark forces controlling the narrative, and use a bit of deductive reasoning. There are no such records of mass killings, no place to dispose of the bodies, or even means to kill that many people unnoticed. The numbers of those allegedly killed changes from account to account...some, as you say, describe 1.5 million, others say either "1.8 million" or "over 2 million," and yet others say, "800 thousand." Which is it? Are the claims no more precise than this? The method employed was "carbon monoxide poisoning from vehicle exhaust," but no credible description of how this was done logically.
All other stories of the holocaust have fallen apart, following court cases, forensic study, and interviews of individuals making such claims. Not one such claim can be verified...we are simply required to take someone's "word" that it actually happened, despite the evidence to the contrary that there was no sharp decline in the census of Jews living in Europe at the time. (As a matter of fact, they grew slightly in numbers.) Conveniently with the claims about Operation Reinhard, the evidence was "buried" by the Germans so that no one could discover the truth.
Some will point to the alleged "confessions" at the Nuremberg trials as evidence. However, when one understands the methods of torture utilized to extract said "confessions," one realizes that they are not confessions at all, but simply agreements from the prisoners to say whatever the torturers were claiming, to make the torture stop.
There is some question about disturbed soil at Treblinka, and the possibility of "mass graves." The fact that the people doing this study had to "sneak around" with ground penetrating radar, since they didn't have permission from museum officials, is a huge red flag. There may have been some unmarked graves at Treblinka, but not containing thousands of bodies. At that time in Europe, there was a typhus epidemic, and it was not prudent to bury diseased bodies since it would contaminate ground water. The crematoriums simply couldn't handle the volume of bodies claimed.
I could go on and on about this, as I'm a bit of a history buff of this period of time, and maintain a large file with good, solid historical research. I can't provide something about Operation Reinhard specifically (aside from all the propaganda that's already out there), but this video link does provide some good, anecdotal evidence of the grifters spreading the holocaust lies, beginning about 2:50 in: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9W7GyE84ngZf/ These people do not represent isolated cases.
I will close by saying that any "historian" claiming that any part of the holocaust is true, is a Zionist puppet, and not to be taken seriously. I would heartily debate that Irving is "...one of the best today." There is PLENTY of evidence to the contrary with respect to the holocaust, and as I said above, not one piece of historical evidence exists in support of the ridiculous claims. We can't parrot the claims as truth, without rigorously examining and weighing both sides. If we do not do this, we are simply doing the propagandists' work for them.
The entirety of the agenda, of which the holocaust is but one small piece, is part of a much larger plan -- a plan that is currently underway around the world. Hiding historical details is how the plan continues in operation, because exposing the truth of those historical elements will cause the whole thing to crumble.
The very best records indicate that perhaps 250,000 to 275,000 Jews died in the camps, mostly as the result of typhus.
They all died because they refused to abandon their homes after being ordered to do so by their unelected govt., for the crime of "guilt by association." They were killed by the German version of "red flag laws." Deprogram yourself from the nazi brainwash.
Fren, I think it would be helpful for you to actually take a look at unbiased historical examination of the events in question. What you claim is not supported by actual fact.
I have to wonder, why people come to this forum at all if they're not willing to question the narrative, and perhaps learn something in the process?
Nazi
1930, noun and adjective, from German Nazi, abbreviation of German pronunciation of Nationalsozialist (based on earlier German sozi, popular abbreviation of "socialist"), from Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei "National Socialist German Workers' Party," led by Hitler from 1920.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/nazi
This definition is not correct. It's the definition provided by the propagandists themselves, to misdirect where it really came from. This is all part of a massive coverup/psyop.
There are countless first hand survivor accounts of the concentration camps and ghettoes and the mass murder of undesirables, mostly Jews that occurred at the hands of the Nazis. Maybe some
Of the details are fuzzy but the point OP is making is very relevant to today.
These so-called accounts, have all been discredited decades ago, some of them in court. There is no actual evidence of any of these atrocities, yet volumes of evidence to the contrary.
Jews were in camps, to be sure, but only because they were either communists or communist sympathizers attempting to overthrow the government.
Well, first of all, the reference to "Nazi" is a term that was never used by Germans themselves. It was an insult coined by Konrad Heiden, a Jewish propagandist. If you want to start with propaganda, that's as good a place as any.
Much of what is discussed today about the Third Reich, is what is known as "bad propaganda." There was actually "good propaganda" in use during that time as well, most famously by Josef Goebbels. There were so many lies during that time being circulated by the bolshevik communists describing the evils of Germany, that it was having an effect on the German populace. Goebbels was instrumental in creating "good propaganda" to remind the German people of their heritage, and their accomplishments, and to ignore the lies being said about them.
I really don't know what you mean when you say, "social control," as that could mean any one of several things. I can say, however, that the reconstruction of Germany following the Weimar Republic was nothing short of miraculous, and the Germans recognized and appreciated all that was done for them to bring them out of the ashes. They enjoyed more freedoms following Weimar, and enjoyed more wealth and success than ever before. The stability of their currency was vitally important.
It's important to note that during this same time frame, the rest of the world was still struggling to overcome the after-effects of the Great Depression.
bad propaganda? GTFO Nazi killed 6 million Jews and 298,000 Americans died because of Nazis. That is not bad propaganda. That is a bad people. The rest of what you commented is just gobbly gook.
If you really spent the time to understand what happened in WWI, The Treaty of Versailles, The Weimar Republic, and WWII, you would know that what you just wrote is more propaganda. The very best records indicate that perhaps 250,000 to 275,000 Jews died in the camps, mostly as the result of typhus. Why would there be hospitals and doctors if the agenda were to execute?
David Irving ( one of the best historians alive today) started out disbelieving the "death camp" story. I think this definately applies to Auschwitz- proof of gas chambers there is more full of holes than Obama's birth certificate. However, Mr Irving recounts in a later talk the story of Operation Reinhardt- this operation was an extermination of primarily Jews in order to confiscate their assets, carried out at the camps of Sobibor, Belzec and Treblinka. Their is proof of the killing of 1.5 million, and hints at more than that. These camps where burnt to the ground and then planted over to camoflage them after the operation was complete, at Himmlers order.
In order to historically analyze the story about "Operation Reinhard," one must understand a bit about the methods behind the dark forces controlling the narrative, and use a bit of deductive reasoning. There are no such records of mass killings, no place to dispose of the bodies, or even means to kill that many people unnoticed. The numbers of those allegedly killed changes from account to account...some, as you say, describe 1.5 million, others say either "1.8 million" or "over 2 million," and yet others say, "800 thousand." Which is it? Are the claims no more precise than this? The method employed was "carbon monoxide poisoning from vehicle exhaust," but no credible description of how this was done logically.
All other stories of the holocaust have fallen apart, following court cases, forensic study, and interviews of individuals making such claims. Not one such claim can be verified...we are simply required to take someone's "word" that it actually happened, despite the evidence to the contrary that there was no sharp decline in the census of Jews living in Europe at the time. (As a matter of fact, they grew slightly in numbers.) Conveniently with the claims about Operation Reinhard, the evidence was "buried" by the Germans so that no one could discover the truth.
Some will point to the alleged "confessions" at the Nuremberg trials as evidence. However, when one understands the methods of torture utilized to extract said "confessions," one realizes that they are not confessions at all, but simply agreements from the prisoners to say whatever the torturers were claiming, to make the torture stop.
There is some question about disturbed soil at Treblinka, and the possibility of "mass graves." The fact that the people doing this study had to "sneak around" with ground penetrating radar, since they didn't have permission from museum officials, is a huge red flag. There may have been some unmarked graves at Treblinka, but not containing thousands of bodies. At that time in Europe, there was a typhus epidemic, and it was not prudent to bury diseased bodies since it would contaminate ground water. The crematoriums simply couldn't handle the volume of bodies claimed.
I could go on and on about this, as I'm a bit of a history buff of this period of time, and maintain a large file with good, solid historical research. I can't provide something about Operation Reinhard specifically (aside from all the propaganda that's already out there), but this video link does provide some good, anecdotal evidence of the grifters spreading the holocaust lies, beginning about 2:50 in: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9W7GyE84ngZf/ These people do not represent isolated cases.
I will close by saying that any "historian" claiming that any part of the holocaust is true, is a Zionist puppet, and not to be taken seriously. I would heartily debate that Irving is "...one of the best today." There is PLENTY of evidence to the contrary with respect to the holocaust, and as I said above, not one piece of historical evidence exists in support of the ridiculous claims. We can't parrot the claims as truth, without rigorously examining and weighing both sides. If we do not do this, we are simply doing the propagandists' work for them.
The entirety of the agenda, of which the holocaust is but one small piece, is part of a much larger plan -- a plan that is currently underway around the world. Hiding historical details is how the plan continues in operation, because exposing the truth of those historical elements will cause the whole thing to crumble.
They all died because they refused to abandon their homes after being ordered to do so by their unelected govt., for the crime of "guilt by association." They were killed by the German version of "red flag laws." Deprogram yourself from the nazi brainwash.
Fren, I think it would be helpful for you to actually take a look at unbiased historical examination of the events in question. What you claim is not supported by actual fact.
I have to wonder, why people come to this forum at all if they're not willing to question the narrative, and perhaps learn something in the process?
Nazi 1930, noun and adjective, from German Nazi, abbreviation of German pronunciation of Nationalsozialist (based on earlier German sozi, popular abbreviation of "socialist"), from Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei "National Socialist German Workers' Party," led by Hitler from 1920. https://www.etymonline.com/word/nazi
This definition is not correct. It's the definition provided by the propagandists themselves, to misdirect where it really came from. This is all part of a massive coverup/psyop.
There are countless first hand survivor accounts of the concentration camps and ghettoes and the mass murder of undesirables, mostly Jews that occurred at the hands of the Nazis. Maybe some Of the details are fuzzy but the point OP is making is very relevant to today.
These so-called accounts, have all been discredited decades ago, some of them in court. There is no actual evidence of any of these atrocities, yet volumes of evidence to the contrary.
Jews were in camps, to be sure, but only because they were either communists or communist sympathizers attempting to overthrow the government.