The biggest secret about the bombing of Japan is that one of the bombs was German. Ask yourself why they tested the Plutonium bomb ( in the New Mexico desert) but never the Uranium bomb? The Uranium bomb was likely tested by the Germans at Rugen ( see Zinser affadavit and Carter Heydrichs excellent Crtical Mass) in 1944.
Interesting. The history of the Korean war has always bugged me- like we aren't getting the full story (like WW2). Allen Dulles spoke with the NK leader a week before the war started..the battle at Chosin reservoir just happened to be were the Japanese had a nuclear research site during WW2...We also used bio weapons likely sourced from the Nazis/Japanese on the Koreans and Chinese. The idea that so soon after WW2, having interviewed the German generals about the eastern front that the US Army/Marines would not be prepared for human wave attacks from a Communist enemy boggles the mind. Possible that USA won the Korean war big, and acted as if they didnt to install the CIA as leadership in the North?
I am no Nazi, but fighting the Soviet Union is not a conviction. Remember Patton wanted to keep rolling the tanks to Moscow. Even Churchill-that drunken war criminal-put together Operation unthinkable to attack the Soviet Union. The Fins were "Allies" with the Germans , but maintained quite a bit of distance from them, including a separate command structure.
Not at all. Hitler was a product of his time and environment. As I said, I don't think there were "good guys" in that war. My point is simply that much of the history we are taught about WW2 is a fabrication to support the post war "international rules based order" that we live in now. To end that globalist tyranny, we must deconstruct the myth of WW2 that they have created as the origin story of our age.
Hitler invaded the USSR to get the jump on Stalin, who was building up to head west within 3 months after the kickoff of Barbarossa.
He invaded France because they declared war when he invaded Poland. I also believe it was retribution for French colonial forces occupying the Ruhr valley region in the 1920s, and the rape and starvation that created.
Poland I think we could argue about. I understand the desire to reverse the loss of territory that the terrible treaty of Versailles imposed, but all of Poland seems a little too much. Poland then though, was used by the West like Ukraine is now- and what did the west care about "brave little Poland" after the war when the same butchers that led the 1917 Russian revolution conquered it? Not a peep. War is a rich man's trick.
I dont think there were "good guys" in that war, but holding Germany (a 95% Christian nation then) up as the ultimate evil vs Soviet Bolshevism is simply laughable.
If you like Ernst Zundel, you should try David Irving. Likely the best WW2 historian of his generation. The history of WW2 is one of the most covered up and distorted areas of modern history- and our entire society is structured around the "post war international rules based order"- but that order ia a fabrication.
Also worth a look- Victor Suvarov is a former KGB General that has a compelling case that Stalin was preparing to go West, and that is why Hitler launces Operation Barbarossa. Interesting to say the least.
Ok ladies and gents. Operation Chaos 3.0 time. Take pictures of every strange electronic device you can and flood her office with pictures and descriptions of this ultra cutting edge tech being used by ICE. Ideas: The guts of a VCR, random circuit boards, the tesla coil from your 8th grade science fair. This could be fun!
I'm sorry, the Red Army raping and pillaging their way through Germany was not a "liberator". It was a hostile takeover by an even worse political system.