Somebody would be in big trouble if any record of the alleged assassination plot is on Twitter.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
That is not the drop. It does not mention 'who owns Twitter'. The actual post was pointing to when Twitter was a corporation.
This is stinking lefty shit trying to get the anons to back their hatred and desire to see Musk removed.
Don't believe me? Read it for yourself.
https://qanon.pub/#586
u/#q586
Every case should be challenged we already k ow they are corrupt.
I want to know that 60%!
WHG Q post ends at "...foreign allies were involved?"
and then he asks questions for his followers is how I interpret
Yes, he asks question in just the same tone and format as Q would ask them. You believe what ever you like, but as far as I'm concerned I can read between the lines well enough to see exactly what is being attempted.
I'll plead some ignorance here. I have not read all of the Q posts and had never read this one or seen it plainly referenced. I've seen a line or two, but not all in one fell swoop.
That's to the point and vicious!
I had not read that particular drop myself, but then that is exactly what they count on. You will just take their word for it, but when they put the drop number in there they are making it to easy. They think GAW's folks won't bother to fact check them, but we will.
Thanks for linking.
The first block of text is a partial quote of a long Q drop. The line break is the end of the quote from Q drop 586.
Then W.H.G. asks some of his own questions in the next block of text...
Oblakhan here on GAW is too stupid to understand any of this, and accuses W.H.G. of a fake quote of a Q drop (the part where he asks his own questions).
Other morons here on GAW agree wholeheartedly with Oblakhan. This is exactly why I find myself focusing more and more on TS and Twitter, and less on GAW.
Well if you don't like it, hit the road.
Apparently you are to damned stupid to even see what he is attempting to do.
Try to answer the questions, and figure out who he is talking about.
Like "who owns twitter"? At the time of the drop time twitter was publicly owned. So who owns twitter? He is talking about Musk.
"will he step down". Who was going to step down at that time? The corporate board? The stockholders? BULLSHIT He is referring to Musk again. Who wants Musk gone more than anyone? THE CABAL wants Musk gone.
Get a fucking brain.
MI-Vet, you are 100% correct. The problem was we had a person who was going 'to find' something, whether it existed or not.
A knee jerk reaction, no intelligence involved here..