Why Sexual Morality May be Far More Important than You Ever Thought
(www.kirkdurston.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I will not dwell on this longer...
but I would not be very happy if supporting and spreading this patriot movement, which is counter culture and nothing short of revolutionary only resulted in a theocracy run by ideagogues
Please be aware that the cabal runs very deep and used both puritanism and hedonism equally to control and subjugate the population. Even something as "innocent" as the idea of punctuality was a tool implemented to maximize the efficiency of workers.
Case in point, someone in this very thread just said orgasming is a sin. I am convinced the left really will trick conservatives into implementing Sharia under the guise of morality
For the moment let's suppose that conservatives are "tricked" into adopting Sharia. (Also, say that out loud and see how ludicrous that sounds.) If, if, it happened, conservatives would need to mass convert to Islam (again, say this out loud) and if so are in immediate ideological alignment with a cohort; pick your flavor, Sunni, Shia or other. Then what, how soon does the LGBTQ$ purge begin? With global homos running most of the reset, how exactly does it benefit their agenda? Unless it's fulfilled by them being thrown off buildings this never happens.
Related -
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=muslims+michigan+lgbtq&ia=web
You're right in general, but I have met several conservative men who have been shafted by the family court system, especially were children are concerned, who would opt for Sharia in a heartbeat.
To the orgasm is sin point. We have strayed so fall since the fall of man. We do not know what it is to be sinless nor what is creation vs corruption.
I agree. You echo some thoughts from the Toronto Protocols - detailing globalists’ plan to use the sexual revolution to destroy the family.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXQmpVO4/not-news-to-anons-but-interestin/
Theocracy or no, there's no denying that everything that's gone wrong in this country over the past 100 years wouldn't have happened without women voters. All they do is shift the candidates and the elections to the left.
Furthermore, there's no denying the fact that women's liberation directly results in the birthrate falling below replacement levels.
Personally I wouldn't go to some islamic shariah law. But I would go back to how America was before all this women's lib destroyed the country. And I wouldn't say we were a theocracy then. We were a free country -- more free than we are now.
The consequences have now played out long enough for it to be apparent to all that women's lib was a mistake and will lead to our destruction.