That's exactly how I feel
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
The comment didn't reference the 80s. You injected that time frame. I'm pretty sure they are referring to the crusades, lordship, serfdom, heresy, heretic framework and the inquisition of countless cultures and people's heritage and genealogy. Some of which that make the accepted and taught version of the holocaust look mild.
The Crusades as taught by the cabal is a lie though. Dr. Bill Warner has exposed that. The Crusades were a highly controlled, defensive war (series of small battles) to prevent an Islamic takeover of Europe, who had already overrun Spain and were at the Gates of Vienna. Christians avoided war with Islam for decades before their hand was forced, and then they were beaten back to the desert and Europe once again flourished, free from Sharia Law.
I’m not sure about the others (the Inquisition, etc.) but they are likely all cooked by the cabal as well. With every historical subject I’ve done a deep dive on, the “official” narrative has turned out to be a complete lie, in the same way we see with modern day FAKE NEWS. The two are connected. The Crusades were defensive, Anne Frank wrote her diary with a pen that hadn’t been invented yet, Rosa Parks was a plant, Helen Keller had a British accent, Pearl Harbor was an inside job, Titanic was an assassination, Oswald was a patsy for the CIA, and on and on it goes. All fake.
Also, who would call the Crusades (the fake evil version of them) a form of “cancel culture”? And then who would make the argument that the ‘90s - present day cancel culture is a direct reaction to the overbearing “Christian cancel culture” that came before if they aren’t referring to the post-WW2 - ‘80s era? It doesn’t make sense to me that ‘90s cancel culture would have been sparked by “The Crusades” and “The Inquisition”. If so, why the ‘90s? Why would the pushback only start then?