That's exactly how I feel
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
String of nasty insults aside, you avoided the argument. How do you stop necrophilic consent using the non-aggression principle? You can’t.
The only way to say this is wrong is the objective morality of God. The non-aggression principle gets you about 75% of the way towards a working moral code in the same way that “Treat others as you want to be treated” does, but it is not enough. You still need a moral authority for an objective (shared) right and wrong.
Subjective morality CANNOT be used to stop this example. That is why the first and only principle of Satanism - “Do as thou wilt” - is an appeal to subjective morality. From that, all evil follows, some aggressed, and some non-aggressed.
Perhaps you have misunderstood the example and think I am the one who is pro-necrophilia? I am not. I’m arguing against it, but using the objective morality of God to do so.
Not sure why you feel the need to attack everyone else here either.
Nasty insults? You're the one obsessed with necrophilia.
Again, there's a segment of this board that only wants freedom so that they can implement their own version of tyranny. Just own it.
I don’t think you really have an argument here. You must be a Libertarian who has been shown the limitations in your philosophy and you’re lashing out at me because of it. And yeah, I would absolutely violate the non-aggression principle to ban consensual sex with corpses, for sure. I would also ban Drag Queen Story Hour and educators pushing transgenderism and gender confusion on children. I also think people should be legally required to cover their genitals in public, which also violates the non-aggression principle.