His absence or presence has no relevance to when and if the Russians overrun Ukraine. His handlers are doubtless keeping loved ones as hostages at gunpoint.
Yes but the Russians literally don’t have the capability or capacity to decisively defeat Ukraine at this point anyways. At least until NATO weapons dry up.
What kind of “president” travels around during supposedly “Russian invasion”?
I mean presumably he’s going to get more money for the defensive efforts so it would make sense theoretically.
It’s not like the Russians have the capability to overrun the country in his absence
His absence or presence has no relevance to when and if the Russians overrun Ukraine. His handlers are doubtless keeping loved ones as hostages at gunpoint.
Yes but the Russians literally don’t have the capability or capacity to decisively defeat Ukraine at this point anyways. At least until NATO weapons dry up.
That's the MSM narrative.