Assertion/opinion. No convincing argument I can see.
Sorry if if I hurt your feelings there.
Kek. Apology accepted. But no, (my apology) sorry that you didn't (I suspect you would have liked to?)
You seemed to get your angries whirling.
Dunno about that. Seems like a large suitcase of projection there.
What sort of dumb definition or standard is that?
Hehe. That was uncalled for. Emotionally charged response. Even if I disagree with your reasoning, it was preemptive and kinda lame to call the definition "dumb". So, apologies on that score.
Paytriot. Just admit it. He is worshipped, but if he’s more legit than anyone here (aside from glow fags and shills), then i’m a monkey’s uncle.
"more legit"
What sort of dumb definition or standard is that?
What the heck do you think is "more legit", and why on earth would you apply that as a standard to evaluating value people bring to the table.
Is there some competition to be "more legit" that no one told me about?
Uh… he is illegitimate. Legitimate is more legit than illegitimate. Sorry if if I hurt your feelings there. You seemed to get your angries whirling.
Assertion/opinion. No convincing argument I can see.
Kek. Apology accepted. But no, (my apology) sorry that you didn't (I suspect you would have liked to?)
Dunno about that. Seems like a large suitcase of projection there.
Hehe. That was uncalled for. Emotionally charged response. Even if I disagree with your reasoning, it was preemptive and kinda lame to call the definition "dumb". So, apologies on that score.
If you can’t immediately see that he’s a paytriot, no explanation or argument could ever ‘convince’ you, because you’re in denial.