Assertion/opinion. No convincing argument I can see.
Sorry if if I hurt your feelings there.
Kek. Apology accepted. But no, (my apology) sorry that you didn't (I suspect you would have liked to?)
You seemed to get your angries whirling.
Dunno about that. Seems like a large suitcase of projection there.
What sort of dumb definition or standard is that?
Hehe. That was uncalled for. Emotionally charged response. Even if I disagree with your reasoning, it was preemptive and kinda lame to call the definition "dumb". So, apologies on that score.
Yeah, nah. The fact that you make assertions do not make those assertions facts.
BTW, your argument here is ludicrous, anyway. "If you cannot immediately see X, it means you are in denial, and no argument...."
I mean, seems like an argument specifically designed to NOT present any evidence or even engage in discussion.
I really don't mind, though, because while you appear to get cookie point thrills by making ungrounded assertions about others that shore up your own egotistical preconceptions, I'm not interested. I'm interested in discussion and learning, even if (and especially if) its learning that develops my understanding.
So far, you offer nothing in that regard.
Which makes me really wonder why you are here..... But maybe that's just me.
Assertion/opinion. No convincing argument I can see.
Kek. Apology accepted. But no, (my apology) sorry that you didn't (I suspect you would have liked to?)
Dunno about that. Seems like a large suitcase of projection there.
Hehe. That was uncalled for. Emotionally charged response. Even if I disagree with your reasoning, it was preemptive and kinda lame to call the definition "dumb". So, apologies on that score.
If you can’t immediately see that he’s a paytriot, no explanation or argument could ever ‘convince’ you, because you’re in denial.
Yeah, nah. The fact that you make assertions do not make those assertions facts.
BTW, your argument here is ludicrous, anyway. "If you cannot immediately see X, it means you are in denial, and no argument...."
I mean, seems like an argument specifically designed to NOT present any evidence or even engage in discussion.
I really don't mind, though, because while you appear to get cookie point thrills by making ungrounded assertions about others that shore up your own egotistical preconceptions, I'm not interested. I'm interested in discussion and learning, even if (and especially if) its learning that develops my understanding.
So far, you offer nothing in that regard.
Which makes me really wonder why you are here..... But maybe that's just me.