Yeah, nah. The fact that you make assertions do not make those assertions facts.
BTW, your argument here is ludicrous, anyway. "If you cannot immediately see X, it means you are in denial, and no argument...."
I mean, seems like an argument specifically designed to NOT present any evidence or even engage in discussion.
I really don't mind, though, because while you appear to get cookie point thrills by making ungrounded assertions about others that shore up your own egotistical preconceptions, I'm not interested. I'm interested in discussion and learning, even if (and especially if) its learning that develops my understanding.
So far, you offer nothing in that regard.
Which makes me really wonder why you are here..... But maybe that's just me.
If you can’t immediately see that he’s a paytriot, no explanation or argument could ever ‘convince’ you, because you’re in denial.
Yeah, nah. The fact that you make assertions do not make those assertions facts.
BTW, your argument here is ludicrous, anyway. "If you cannot immediately see X, it means you are in denial, and no argument...."
I mean, seems like an argument specifically designed to NOT present any evidence or even engage in discussion.
I really don't mind, though, because while you appear to get cookie point thrills by making ungrounded assertions about others that shore up your own egotistical preconceptions, I'm not interested. I'm interested in discussion and learning, even if (and especially if) its learning that develops my understanding.
So far, you offer nothing in that regard.
Which makes me really wonder why you are here..... But maybe that's just me.