Your Alt-Reality Is Boring......A plea for more interesting alt-realities than the Moon Landing Hoax, Flat Earth, and No Virus.
(barsoom.substack.com)
** THERE WILL BE A QUIZ **
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (257)
sorted by:
Imagine after knowing about all of the lies, false flags, and theatrics still believing that the moon landing was real.
One of the last things I saw posted by Wikileaks was a series of videos that seem to be 'the set of the moon landing' consistent with the hills in the background of the live video.. I haven't done a ton of research on it - but the videos seemed pretty damming to me.
I want to believe so bad that we went to the moon.. but I also want to believe so bad that 9/11 wasn't an inside job.. The evidence seems to go definitively against the narrative.
One factor that most wouldn't consider is that the atmospheric pressure they would need to keep the space suits survivable is balanced by the pressure on the exterior (aka at ground level would be roughly zero pressure), but when you take that into a vacuum it becomes a pretty extreme pressure vessel, and that moon lander looked like it was wrapped in aluminum foil.
Anything Langley touches is contaminated, including 'Never A Straight Answer'
NVM that you can take the "earthrise on the moon" photo adjust the levels and the photoshopping (manual equivalent) sticks out like a thumb (we know where they allegedly landed and we only ever see the same face of the moon, therefore the earth would always be near perpendicular from the surface from that location).
Which itself doesn't mean that the whole moon landing was fake, I had believed that they faked images to conceal the actual technologies involved for a long while.
Edit: Lots of downvotes on this, but ignores the fact that the earth always sees the same face of the moon, meaning there is NO EARTH RISING on the moon, the earth would be stationary from the moon perspective and relative to the position on the moon where people landed. Can any of the downvoters explain why they expect a surface that always faces towards the earth would see the earth moving in the sky? Not that the moon wouldn't have a day/night cycle, but that the earth should be anything but stationary from that perspective?
If the earth is sonhuge next to the moon why is it always tiny in the pics? Standing on the moon the earth should dwarf the viewer.
I believe this would be correct, if the moon is some 200k miles away and the earth is some x larger than the earth, then yes. it should be larger from the moon perspective too.
It takes about five seconds of research to find out that the famous Earthrise photo was taken while in orbit around the moon, and not from the surface.
That's a different photo. The blackness in that photo is because they turned the lights off in the ship, not space.
A different photo than what? I'm just pointing out that when Apollo 8 took a photo of the Earth rising up past the Moons horizon, it did so while orbiting the moon. Apollo 8 did not land on the part of the Moon where the Earth would be overhead, because it never landed on the Moon.
Which is the photo you are talking about with the impossible earthrise?
Same answer. Tje earth didn't get smaller because they werent on the surface.
You're forgetting that the earth is spinning on its axis as well as rotating around the sun.
GIF
No, it's accepting that, the model presented in that GIF SHOULD have the moon rotating around the earth on the same axis as the north-south geologic pole. That pole is 23.4° North (66.6 degrees from the equator).
The important point is that we ALWAYS, for the entire recorded history, has the moon pointing a constant face towards the earth. 1 rotation of the moon = 1 rotation of the moon around the earth. (Unless you get into some more obscure references that claim the moon was placed in its position and prior to that the earth did not have a moon)
We are in a construct....a simulation...
Not hard to imagine. If your echo chamber is censored like Facebook and Twitter and Huffington post then of course you will be hesitant to listen to "dangerous" QAnon posts but will jump right in line for another boostie. Everyone here has misinterpreted q posts at some point. How many were blackpilled by date fags until things started happening on deltas. The people that protest too loudly about other peoples beliefs are simply in a different echo chamber and are too lazy to figure out what they really know from first hand observations. At this point the lines are drawn, some take jabs and wear masks because their minds would crack if they were shown hard facts about the deception. There is no reason to argue with anybody that is closed to considering other ideas. I still know people to this day swear there were WMDs in Iraq, still think JFK was shot by a lone bolt action wizard, and still believe fire melted steel but left passports unscathed. It doesn't bother me you believe that a pandemic came from bat soup or Biden got 81m votes or that the world is stationary or spinning. I can't prove you wrong so go for it. Bring the receipts.
Yeah, like, why of all things is this “historical event” off-limits for questioning? It’s a whole heck of a lot more tame than the idea that the entirety of the cosmos functions entirely differently to what we see and are taught.
Because they would never lie to us. Lmao
lol, Elon is onboard...
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1608828315581976576?s=20&t=5vGU7NYud48mzd_VWTLjkA