Your Alt-Reality Is Boring......A plea for more interesting alt-realities than the Moon Landing Hoax, Flat Earth, and No Virus.
(barsoom.substack.com)
** THERE WILL BE A QUIZ **
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (257)
sorted by:
Imagine after knowing about all of the lies, false flags, and theatrics still believing that the moon landing was real.
NVM that you can take the "earthrise on the moon" photo adjust the levels and the photoshopping (manual equivalent) sticks out like a thumb (we know where they allegedly landed and we only ever see the same face of the moon, therefore the earth would always be near perpendicular from the surface from that location).
Which itself doesn't mean that the whole moon landing was fake, I had believed that they faked images to conceal the actual technologies involved for a long while.
Edit: Lots of downvotes on this, but ignores the fact that the earth always sees the same face of the moon, meaning there is NO EARTH RISING on the moon, the earth would be stationary from the moon perspective and relative to the position on the moon where people landed. Can any of the downvoters explain why they expect a surface that always faces towards the earth would see the earth moving in the sky? Not that the moon wouldn't have a day/night cycle, but that the earth should be anything but stationary from that perspective?
It takes about five seconds of research to find out that the famous Earthrise photo was taken while in orbit around the moon, and not from the surface.
That's a different photo. The blackness in that photo is because they turned the lights off in the ship, not space.
A different photo than what? I'm just pointing out that when Apollo 8 took a photo of the Earth rising up past the Moons horizon, it did so while orbiting the moon. Apollo 8 did not land on the part of the Moon where the Earth would be overhead, because it never landed on the Moon.
Which is the photo you are talking about with the impossible earthrise?